Okay a couple of questions for you all.

1. If a team has 5 players eligible to play do they have to have 5 on the floor? I want the actual rule not just oppinion here. I was at a game once where the coach did not sub when subs were available and a kid fouled out. Later on he made the substitution and they were back to 5 players.

2. If a team has only 5 players and one is injured to the extent that he is not able to be bought in with a time out. That player must leave the game and can not sub until after the clock has started and the next oppurtunity to sub comes around. So his team will have to play with 4 until that time when he can come back in and make it 5, correct?

What level?
What rules?

NFHS rules:

1)If a team has 5 eligible players,they <b>must</b> have 5 on the floor. Case book play 3.1.1Situation.

2)Correct

I want????

No "please"?

Doesn't this constitute an opinion?

You heard the guy....NO OPINIONS!

(IMO)

Doesn't this constitute an opinion?

You heard the guy....NO OPINIONS!

(IMO)

[/B][/QUOTE]That's the problem with this forum. There's too damn many opinions!!

IMO.

Question asked...

Question answered...

Let it go, who cares if SteveF "WANTED" or asks.

They can buy him in with a TO.

Me.

Awwww geeze, see that. You just had to go & open your big mouth & start a fight. You are unbelievable

IMO.

I, too.

Sorry, should have said I would appreciate the actual rule and not opinion.

Sorry, should have said I would appreciate the actual rule and not opinion.
[/B][/QUOTE]No problem, Steve. I posted that half in jest, anyway. Probably shoulda put a smiley on it.

Quarter limitations
 

If your state has a limitations on the number of quarters that a person can play in one night even though they are in the book and listed as substitutes they would not be required to come into the game. State rules would supercede Federation rules. If they played it may result in forfeiture of the game for playing more than the allowable quarters for that night. Our state has a five quarter limitation. Actually to violate this rule is not a concern of the officials but is an administrative problem. We would not require them to participate but if they do it is out of our jurisdiction and we do not penalize the infraction.

If so my deepest apology to Dan.

Started off having a bad day,though he was just adding to it.

No need to give Dan an apology. If you go back and read Dan's post, he said "No opinions"- then added "I(n)M(y)O(pinion)".

This was another one of Dan's typically usual feeble attempts at humor. Do what we do. Laugh at him, not with him.

Oh, my !
 

I was just moderated !

Re: Oh, my !
 

No, I said "half in jest". :D

Dan or I would never dream of moderating. Neither one of us wants to go blind!

Re: Re: Oh, my !
 

Can't we just do it until we need glasses? These guys did

http://www.happyfunpundit.com/hfp/im...damglasses.jpg
http://www.lesion.com/april/geraldo.jpg
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/175000...n_stmt_150.jpg


(BTW, I can say with certainty that there is not 1 picture of a squirrel on the entire internet.)

Re: Re: Re: Oh, my !
 

BTW, I can say with certainty that there is not 1 picture of a squirrel on the entire internet.
[/B][/QUOTE]Do you mean a squirrel with glasses? Or a squirrel with a white cane? :D

Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, my !
 

Do you mean a squirrel with glasses? Or a squirrel with a white cane? :D [/B][/QUOTE]

Yes

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, my !
 

Yes [/B][/QUOTE]

Two flew over the cuckoo's nest.

Two flew over the cuckoo's nest.

[/B][/QUOTE]Don't forget our podna from the U.P.!!

http://www.sodamnfunny.com/Animation...guinsdance.gif

[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Jan 28th, 2004 at 03:52 PM]