|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I say
Quote:
|
|
||||
All I see are references to "legal guarding position." Are you saying that directly equates to playing legal defense? And, are you saying that in order to have a PC foul, the defender in question has to have LGP? Aren't there potential PC fouls in which the defender does not have LGP?
|
|
|||
Quote:
The fed rewrote the section on LGP but they screwed it up. This was discussed ad nauseum over the summer on both forums. Since then the fed has released an interpretation that says a player cannot gain LGP if he's standing OOB and he loses any LGP he might have had once he steps OOB. It's on their pages somewhere, look it up.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Quote:
Make sense, now? |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Quote:
Agree that the defender doesn't have to be stationary to have LGP. My point is the without LGP, a player loses the right to verticality and lateral movement. The player has to be inbounds to have LGP. Further, there are several cases where a player who does not have LGP can be fouled. This is one of them. Quote:
Additionally, part b of situation 7 goes on to explain that it is a PC foul because B1 had LGP...of which being inbounds is a requirement. This is no different than B4 waiting for a rebound when A1 instead drives the lane and up the back of B4. B4 didn't have LGP but that doesn't give A1 the right to run him over. B4, if OOB, does not have LGP but it doesn't make him a target. In spite of another poorly written rule/case, it can't possibly be the intent to make B4 open game for contact. I agree that in most practical cases, however, it will lead to a block. Otherwise the dribbler will have plenty of time to avoid the contact or it will be intentional. The player can still be pushed, held, etc. I just want to avoid creating a paraphrase of the rule that is not completely accurate ala "traveling is more then 2 steps", "traveling on the throwin"...the list can go on with over simplifications that morph into inaccuracies. |
Bookmarks |
|
|