![]() |
Was doing my junior league games yesterday (i.e. 3-4 graders). We all know that most are not the most coordinated, so my partner and I let a few (JUST A FEW) things slide. We know that, the table knows that, the coaches know that.
One example of a 'slide' would be a very slight foot shuffle. Again, not the most coordinated kids. But if they move A LOT, partner & I make those calls. I stuck around after my games to see a friend of mine work. A parent (i guess), very tactfully (which I am very responsive to answer to), asked what I saw or didn't see. He was wondering what considerations my partner & I took in [not] calling these type of violations. I told him about their skill levels, advantage/disadvantage, etc. Otherwise, we'd be there all day with violation calls. He wondered if the kids were learning anything from our no-calls, which got me thinking also that he has a very good point. Since we ARE there to teach these kids, what should I do for these violations? |
Quote:
Does it? Let 'em play. |
One thing to consider, too, is how much are they going to learn if you're stopping the game every time they shuffle their feet to no advantage. Dan's right, it's not our job to teach them, but at the same time....
Basketball at this level is about improvement and teaching. They aren't going to improve their basketball skills a whole lot if all their practicing is throw-ins. |
One thing I have learned over the years (10 years to be exact). Nothing is "Little League" to the parents. Even though their son may only be in 3rd grade, that foul you called just kept him from a scholarship at a D1 college. That being said I agree we have to keep it fun while calling the obvious stuff. In my 10 years I have seen some of the kids go from elementary all the way thru high school. Somewhere along the way they developed just fine even though I did not call every little foot shuffle on them in 3rd grade.
|
Keep on Truckin'!
Yes, "let 'em play" has been my philosophy throughout this lil league adventure. Realizing that we need to leave it up to the coaches to teach the kids, I'll just keep doin what I'm doing. But as the playoffs/championships draw near, maybe I can do a tighter pregame with the coaches so all would be on notice to clean up a few things.
|
I work a lot of the kids ball, and the advantage/disadvantage principle has been the backbone of many of my calls. If a kid walks with the ball every time he gets it, i'll call it, then explain the rule to him. 9 times out of 10, he won't do it again.
|
Even if you call these violations, the kids will still have no idea what they did. And the coaches probably won't explain it.
|
Great point Bktballref, you can call travels all day on little kids, but if the coach doesn't know what the player did (as most don't at that level) and the player doesn't know, not much is gained from that call, especially if there was no advantage gained. When the kids become more accustomed to the game and get better coaching, they'll learn how to use their feet without travelling.
|
I think at the younger age group it is perfectly fine to call the travel and then explain what he is doing wrong, briefly, before inbounding the ball.
|
snakeeyes,
the problem is that while you're inbounding the ball, the player guilty of traveling is (at this level) virtually always going to be headed to the other end of the court. |
Unfortunately, the coaches at this level do not always have teaching in mind at all times. At times, I have seen coaches who are taking things too seriously or are trying to do things too complex to stop and teach a kid why what they did is not allowed. Sadly, they may be too busy yelling at the kid or may just expect the kids to not mess up. So, yes, it can sometimes be our role to teach the young ones about good basketball if we care about the game and its future.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05am. |