Girls' Varsity, 4th quarter (...8 seconds...) , A leading by 2.


A is fouled to shoot two.
B calls time-out.
Teams line up to shoot and after the first miss, B rebounds the ball and races downcourt where Team A knocks ball out-of-bounds at 3/4 court. B to throw in.
(...2 seconds...)
Coach A requests 2nd throw.
Officials oblige and award successful 2nd throw.
[A by 3]
Officials award ball to Team B on end line under Team A basket with 8 seconds.

Lessee....


- Failure to award FT: check
- Corrected at first dead ball: check
- Had a change in possession, resume at POI: ball OOB at sideline eh? hmmmm....
- Points scored, time consumed and other activity not nullified: OOPS! Go to jail, go directly to jail, do not collect $200.

2.10.2 It was recoginized before the second live ball. Ok.

2.10.6 consuption of time and resume play at point of interuption.

Agree with Dan. Don't give those two a varsity contest for ten years. And they don't get their $200 check for this game.

Did the Gremlins win, mick?

YU.P.
Running clock.

<HR>
FWIW JR knows about the local player that will be playing for Marquette University next year.

[Edited by mick on Nov 7th, 2003 at 05:41 AM]

FWIW JR knows about the local player that will be playing for Marquette University next year.

[/B][/QUOTE]The Mighty V! Her Houghton Gremlins are now 10-0 in the WestPac, and 17-1 overall.

on the second throw, are the players lined up along the line as normal? if it is missed, is it just play on from that point? or is the lane cleared for the second shot?

Moral of the story...don't forget how many shots your player is shooting when coming out of a TO!

mick's solution is the way it should be. Dan's solution is correct by the rules. JMO.

Lane cleared because in this case you are going POI to resume play.

No, Chuck, this was not my solution, it was a live case in a game that I did not work.
I offer it only for information of what may happen..., so it won't happen to us. :)

<HR>
Jumping to conclusions may conclude in jumping.

Didn't mean to imply it was your ruling, mick. Sorry. I only meant it was the one you provided. I should have said, "The solution posted by mick. . ." I didn't figure you'd call it that way.