The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   NFHS rules (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/106575-nfhs-rules.html)

benbret Sun Feb 22, 2026 03:10pm

NFHS rules
 
B32 commits a common foul on A14. A is in the bonus. B32 and A14 then hit each other and are called for a double technical foul. Is the point of interruption the 2 few throws by A14 or since the point of interruption was a dead ball do you go to alternating procession after the free throws.

JRutledge Sun Feb 22, 2026 03:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by benbret (Post 1055074)
B32 commits a common foul on A14. A is in the bonus. B32 and A14 then hit each other and are called for a double technical foul. Is the point of interruption the 2 few throws by A14 or since the point of interruption was a dead ball do you go to alternating procession after the free throws.

Let us address some points in your question like this. What is point of interruption? It means just that, the point you interrupted the play before you called any fouls? So, do we go to alternating possession when we call a foul? And if not why? We also never shoot a bonus on a double foul of any kind (not because of the two fouls).

So to answer your question, A14 shoots the 2 free throws for the bonus after you report all the fouls. The POI is shooting the FTs, nothing else.

Peace

SNIPERBBB Sun Feb 22, 2026 03:26pm

POI is the common foul.

We resume play with the results of the common foul.

BillyMac Sun Feb 22, 2026 04:58pm

Rebounding Players ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1055075)
The POI is shooting the FTs, nothing else

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB (Post 1055076)
POI is the common foul. We resume play with the results of the common foul.

... with rebounding players on the lane lines.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mon Feb 23, 2026 07:31pm

This Situation is a False Double Foul!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by benbret (Post 1055074)
B32 commits a common foul on A14. A is in the bonus. B32 and A14 then hit each other and are called for a double technical foul. Is the point of interruption the 2 few throws by A14 or since the point of interruption was a dead ball do you go to alternating procession after the free throws.


This is a situation that reminds us that we need to know our Definitions. What really is this situation: A False Double Foul!

First Foul: B32's CF against A14.

Second Foul: A14 and B32's DTF.

How are FDFs adjudicated. The are Charged and Penalized in the order in which they occurred with the Ball returned to Play as if the Last Foul in the FDF was the only Foul:

1a) If A14's TF did not cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14 will attempt his/her 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

1b) If A14's TF did cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14's Substitute will attempt A14's 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

2) The Ball will be put into Play by a Designated Spot Throw-in by the Team that has the AP Arrow from one of the 8 'Designated Spot Throw-in Throw-in Spots' (Yes, that is the name that I have given those eight spots and I know that Billy is laughing every time I use that name, lol.) closest to the Spot where the DTF occurred. (2025-26 NFHS: R4-S36-A2c and R7-S5-A3)

MTD, Sr.

Mike Goodwin Tue Feb 24, 2026 02:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by benbret (Post 1055074)
B32 commits a common foul on A14. A is in the bonus. B32 and A14 then hit each other and are called for a double technical foul. Is the point of interruption the 2 few throws by A14 or since the point of interruption was a dead ball do you go to alternating procession after the free throws.

Not even the point of interruption.

8-6-3: If a false double foul involves any type of single foul and any type of double foul, play is resumed with the penalty for only the single foul, as if the double or simultaneous foul had not occurred.

Raymond Tue Feb 24, 2026 06:33am

Why is the lane line unoccupied for A14's bonus free throws?

Double technicals are double fouls, they go to the point of interruption. If the point of interruption is possession by a team, they get a throw-in based on the location of the ball. If the point of interruption is free throws, you line everybody up and shoot the free throws.

Did I miss a change to the original scenario?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

bob jenkins Tue Feb 24, 2026 07:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 1055091)
This is a situation that reminds us that we need to know our Definitions. What really is this situation: A False Double Foul!

First Foul: B32's CF against A14.

Second Foul: A14 and B32's DTF.

How are FDFs adjudicated. The are Charged and Penalized in the order in which they occurred with the Ball returned to Play as if the Last Foul in the FDF was the only Foul:

1a) If A14's TF did not cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14 will attempt his/her 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

1b) If A14's TF did cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14's Substitute will attempt A14's 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

2) The Ball will be put into Play by a Designated Spot Throw-in by the Team that has the AP Arrow from one of the 8 'Designated Spot Throw-in Throw-in Spots' (Yes, that is the name that I have given those eight spots and I know that Billy is laughing every time I use that name, lol.) closest to the Spot where the DTF occurred. (2025-26 NFHS: R4-S36-A2c and R7-S5-A3)

MTD, Sr.

I checked my calendar, and it's not April 1.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Feb 24, 2026 09:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 1055091)
This is a situation that reminds us that we need to know our Definitions. What really is this situation: A False Double Foul!

First Foul: B32's CF against A14.

Second Foul: A14 and B32's DTF.

How are FDFs adjudicated. The are Charged and Penalized in the order in which they occurred with the Ball returned to Play as if the Last Foul in the FDF was the only Foul:

1a) If A14's TF did not cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14 will attempt his/her 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

1b) If A14's TF did cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14's Substitute will attempt A14's 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

2) The Ball will be put into Play by a Designated Spot Throw-in by the Team that has the AP Arrow from one of the 8 'Designated Spot Throw-in Throw-in Spots' (Yes, that is the name that I have given those eight spots and I know that Billy is laughing every time I use that name, lol.) closest to the Spot where the DTF occurred. (2025-26 NFHS: R4-S36-A2c and R7-S5-A3)

MTD, Sr.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Goodwin (Post 1055096)
Not even the point of interruption.

8-6-3: If a false double foul involves any type of single foul and any type of double foul, play is resumed with the penalty for only the single foul, as if the double or simultaneous foul had not occurred.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raymond (Post 1055099)
Why is the lane line unoccupied for A14's bonus free throws?

Double technicals are double fouls, they go to the point of interruption. If the point of interruption is possession by a team, they get it a throw-in based on the location of the ball. If the point of interruption is free throws, you line everybody up and shoot the free throws.

Did I miss a change to the original scenario?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 1055100)
I checked my calendar, and it's not April 1.



DOH!!

MTD, Sr.

BillyMac Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:31pm

Mighty Mike ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Goodwin (Post 1055096)
8-6-3: If a false double foul involves any type of single foul and any type of double foul, play is resumed with the penalty for only the single foul, as if the double or simultaneous foul had not occurred.

https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th/id/OIP.W...=Api&P=0&h=180

Nice citation Mike Goodwin.

I look out my window and I imagine what it must be like to live in Fairbanks, Alaska.

Nevadaref Fri Feb 27, 2026 12:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 1055091)
This is a situation that reminds us that we need to know our Definitions. What really is this situation: A False Double Foul!

First Foul: B32's CF against A14.

Second Foul: A14 and B32's DTF.

How are FDFs adjudicated. The are Charged and Penalized in the order in which they occurred with the Ball returned to Play as if the Last Foul in the FDF was the only Foul:

1a) If A14's TF did not cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14 will attempt his/her 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

1b) If A14's TF did cause A14 to become Disqualified, then A14's Substitute will attempt A14's 2 FTs with the Spaces along the FT Lane unoccupied because the Ball will become Dead and remain Dead after the last FT regardless of whether or not it is successful.

2) The Ball will be put into Play by a Designated Spot Throw-in by the Team that has the AP Arrow from one of the 8 'Designated Spot Throw-in Throw-in Spots' (Yes, that is the name that I have given those eight spots and I know that Billy is laughing every time I use that name, lol.) closest to the Spot where the DTF occurred. (2025-26 NFHS: R4-S36-A2c and R7-S5-A3)

MTD, Sr.

This is not correct. We stopped using the AP arrow following double fouls at least a dozen years ago. We now use the POI rule.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Fri Feb 27, 2026 11:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 1055146)
This is not correct. We stopped using the AP arrow following double fouls at least a dozen years ago. We now use the POI rule.


Read my comment of Feb. 24/Tue.(09:22amEST), 2026.

MTD, Sr.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1