![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
New Throw-in Spot following Violation at the Division Line committed by Throwing Team
NFHS Rules.
Up through the 2023-24 season, the Penalty for any violation of R9/S2, "Throw-in Provisions" read, in part: "Following a violation, the ball is awarded to opponents for a throw-in at the original throw-in spot [emphasis added]. Easy, peasy. In 2024-25, the Penalty for any violation of R9/S2, "Throw-in Provisions" was changed to read: a) When the opponent is awarded team control in its frontcourt, the throw-in spot will be at one of the four designated spots nearest the violation. (Diagram 5, aka: "the four spots") b) When the opponent is awarded team control in its backcourt, the throw-in spot will be at the original throw-in spot. [emphasis added]That same season, R7/S5/A3, read in part, "After a violation (9-4 through 9-13) by either team..." Notice R9/S2 was not included here. Still rather easy, peasy. For 2025-26, the Penalty for any violation of R9/S2, "Throw-in Provisions" was changed to read: a) When the opponent is awarded a team control in its frontcourt, the throw-in spot will be based on the location of the violation relative to the three-point line where the violation occurred. (Diagram 5, aka: "the four spots") b) When the opponent is awarded a team control in its backcourt, the throw-in spot will be based on the location of the violation relative to the three-point line where the violation occurred. (Diagram 5, aka: now also "the four spots")R7/S5/A3 has been edited to include violations of R9/S2 and now reads, in part: "After a violation (9-1, 9-2, 9-4 through 9-13) by either team..." That means violations of R9/S2 will take place at one of the eight spots (four FC or four BC). Any reference to the original spot in R9/S2 has been deleted. Scenario: during the first quarter, Team B is assessed an Administrative Technical Foul for requiring the scorer to add a name to the book. Following their two free throws, Team A is awarded a throw-in at the Division Line Opposite the Table. Thrower A-1's inbound pass goes out of bounds untouched over the end line in Team A's front court (9-2-2). Question: Now that any reference to the original spot has been deleted, where is Team B awarded its throw-in due to the violation by Team A? Current rules book and/or case book support? Last edited by Mike Goodwin; Fri Dec 19, 2025 at 02:10am. Reason: clarity |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Short Gyms" Division Line is still Division Line? | NoFussRef | Basketball | 16 | Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:09pm |
| Logic of division line throw in after technical | Rooster | Basketball | 7 | Tue Feb 23, 2010 03:29pm |
| FIBA - division line throw-in violation | JugglingReferee | Basketball | 17 | Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:09am |
| Sitch: FC throw-in near division line. | mick | Basketball | 1 | Wed Dec 05, 2007 06:58pm |
| Player steps on division line while in Front Court , is this a violation | Br36ian | Basketball | 2 | Wed Jan 10, 2001 12:38am |