Jerseys 'tucked in': 2025-26 NCAA Women's Rules Change.
 

The has been a discussion in a Facebook for NFHS Basketball Rules regarding ‘untucked’ jerseys. This is a Rule that has been in effect for over 25 years in NFHS and NCAA Men’s/Women’s Rules.


NCAA Women’s: R1-S22-A10 has been eliminated 2025-26.

Prior to the 2025-26 School Year the NCAA Women’s Rule was R1-S22-A10: “Game jerseys shall be tucked in the game shorts. Note: The first time an official must tell a player to tuck in the game jersey, the official shall issue a warning to the head coach. The next time any player on the same team has the game jersey untucked, that player shall leave the game until the next opportunity to substitute. The official shall enforce this rule at the next dead ball after observing the violation.”

The NCAA Women’s Committee has made a Rules Change: R1-S22-A10 has been eliminated. Players will no longer be required to wear their jerseys tucked into the shorts.

The NCAA Women’s Committee’s “Rationale: Game jerseys have become shorter and are not always manufactured to be long enough to be properly tucked into the game shorts. When players lift their arms, the jersey often becomes untucked, making it difficult for officials to enforce the rule properly.”



NFHS R3-S3-A5: “A player not wearing the pants/skirt properly and above the hips and/or a player not tucking in a team jersey (front and back) designed to be worn
inside the pants/skirt, shall be directed to leave the game as in Rule [R]3-[S]3-[A]4; a
charged time-out shall not alter this requirement.”

AND

NCAA Men’s R1-S22-A10: “Game jerseys shall be tucked in the game shorts.
Note: The first time an official must tell a player to tuck in the game jersey, the official shall issue a warning to the head coach. The next time any player on the same team has the game jersey untucked, that player shall leave the game until the next opportunity to substitute. The official shall enforce this rule at the next dead ball after observing the violation.”

have not been eliminated.

MTD, Sr.

Tuck 'Em In, Look Like A Real Basketball Player, Just Like On Television ...
 

NFHS: If I remember to look (sometimes I have more important things to watch for) I usually remind players to tuck in their jerseys during free throws.

I'm actually willing to do that several times in a game, even to the same player.

However, if I see a player intentionally pull their jerseys out of their shorts, especially if they've already been warned, they sit for a tick, do not pass go, and do not collect two hundred dollars.

Free Pass ...
 

Fat kids get a free pass, as do kids in some of my middle school games with uniform "jerseys" that are actually scrimmage jerseys made of "shiny" synthetic material that easily slips out and becomes untucked all by itself.

I've been observing women's games at a D1 school. What's funny is, the officials who consistently enforced the jersey rule were officials who also worked in the G-League and the WNBA. They had no problem addressing the young ladies.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

When you're looking at players you can't tell the jerseys aren't tucked? You have to be specifically looking for that to notice it?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

The discussion on FB was about a sub at the table with an untucked shirt. Official denies the sub because of the untucked shirt.

Stick Out In A Crowd ...
 

Yes, I sometimes miss it during the thirty-two minutes of the game, especially a hectic game with a lot of competitive match-ups, a lot of up and down action, and a lot of calls and no calls.

And I might occasionally (rarely) miss it during free throws.

I don't ever actually look for it, but if when I do notice it (and I can do so without actually looking for it, offenders seem to just stick out in a crowd), I always deal with it, usually with a warning.

What I'm saying is that some offenders may get away with it for a short period time in the game, but I'll eventually "get them".

Substitution ...
 

Wow. Harsh.

In my NFHS game, I just tell them to tuck it in and immediately allow the substitution.

Same thing with an illegal headband, illegal wristbands, and jewelry that can be easily and quickly removed (e.g., bracelet).

I would not allow an incoming substitute to enter with an illegal undershirt. That will take too much time to fix, so next whistle.

The rule change was met with applause at several different NCAAW rules meetings I attended and / or watched on video.

Defund The Fashion Police ...
 

It wouldn't bother me if the NFHS decided to do the same.

I know of few high school officials that actually relish being the Fashion Police.

I believe that anything that simplifies such fashion duties would be much appreciated.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...9ae714c4_m.jpg

There was no consensus, though, on if (and that's a great big if) an official denied entry for an untucked jersey, when would that substitute next be eligible to be beckoned in by an official.

A few on FB indicated they would require the player to "sit a tick," (in 3-3-4) as if they had been directed to leave the game. I believe the better course of action is for the substitute to wait until the next opportunity to substitute and I can use 3-3-2 as indirect support.

OK... I'll use that logic. A6 is at the table. Violation on the court. A6 is beckoned into the game. A6's shirt is untucked and they are not attempting to tuck it in. I say go back. When is the 'Next Opportunity'? Next dead ball? What if upon being directed to go back and now they are trying to tuck in the shirt while at the table? Can we wait then re-beckon A6 into the game? Or do we tell them to sit and wait for the 'Next Opportunity'? :confused:
BillyMac... I'm turning in my Fashion Police Badge

Once that substitute is beckoned into the game, A6 is now a player by rule. If the official gets to the point of having to direct A6 to leave the game for an untucked jersey (and that can probably be avoided in all but the most-extreme cases of defiance), then yes, the "sit a tick" rule applies.

You choose to ignore it, which I'm not saying is the worst thing in the world. But don't rationalize why you don't enforce it. Especially saying you can't see untucked jerseys through the normal course of doing your duties.

When I first started officiating, early 2000s, there were a few veterans who would do that in my high school association. Don't see it anymore nowadays. What happens now is that whoever's bringing in the sub will tell the sub "tuck your shirt in" as they're coming in the game.

Son Of A Gun ...
 

We also need your pistol.

Choose To Ignore ...
 

Good point, but "choose to ignore" is strong language for what I actually do.

Yes, I don't usually take the time to actually "seek out" offenders with untucked jerseys (as I said before, offenders seem to just stick out in a crowd), but when I do notice offenders with untucked jerseys, I almost always (exception for fat kids and middle school teams with shiny slippery scrimmage type jerseys) enforce such, usually with a stern warning to "Tuck it in", or in extreme cases to take a seat for a tick of the clock.

Locally, I'm considered to be the Gestapo of the Fashion Police. In my occasional high school games, I enforce all (100%) fashion rules and don't ignore anything.

However, in my middle school games, illegal undershirts under sleeveless jerseys on shy adolescent girls can be a problem for some coaches (few know the rules) to take care of (especially just minutes before the jump ball).

I do the best I can with illegal undershirts on middle school girls (no exceptions for boys).

With girls, I never totally ignore, but broach the issue with the coaches as soon as I enter the court, and I again mention it in the pregame coaches and captains meeting.

Our local interpreter and middle school assigner want us to "let middle schol kids play", but that is always stated in the context of "uniforms" (not specifically equipment), thus we allow dark jerseys for home teams, non matching shorts among players, illegal numbers, and duplicate numbers (some years I fill up my Bingo card after just a few weeks), so it's not a stretch for me to allow illegal undershirts under sleeveless jerseys on shy adolescent girls with just a "stern recommendation" for future improvement.

I don't beleive that our local interpreter and middle school assigner would be displeased with me by allowing such girls to play that afternoon rather than sit them on the bench.

Note: In my first year of officiating mostly middle school games, I had a visiting out of area coach threaten to put her girls back on the bus and go home rather than sit the shy girls who refused to remove their illegal undershirts. I decided to "back down". Not my finest hour.

Rules that restrict equipment colors benefit officials by allowing them to easily identify players on each team during fast paced action.

Student athletes should take pride in their appearance as they represent their school and community.

I tell the untucked offenders, "Watch the players on television".

I never in my career sought out somebody to see if they tucked their jersey. I officiated the games and if I saw untucked jerseys, I would address it when I had an opportunity to.

If I had a game where it was a continuous problem, every free throw I administered I would tell everybody to tuck their jerseys. I didn't even look to see if they were tucked in at that point.

As a neutral observer at the D1 level, the D3 level, and the high school level, not seeing it is never an acceptable response.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Word Salad ...
 

Well stated.

Pretty much exactly I what do.

If I had trouble expressing such above, that's on me because I'm not an elegant wordsmith.

As Raymond stated, free throws are a good time (never during a live ball clock running situation) to address such problems because almost all the players are within hearing distance.

With the exception of some middle school uniform issues (dark jerseys for home teams, non-matching shorts among players, illegal numbers, duplicate numbers), that we've been locally instructed to ignore, I always enforce, warn, or at least broach, but never ignore.

Even the slippery shiny scrimmage type jerseys (difficult to stay tucked in) I sometimes see in my middle school games are broached during the coaches captains meeting to get everyone on the same page (including first consulting with my partner).

In all sincerity, I believe that I can definitively say that I never totally ignore any fashion issues.

They're either enforced, warned, or at least broached (fat kids are discussed with partner and possibly opposing coach), but never ignored (except for local middle school exceptions as stated by both our local interpreter and game assigner, often discussed in coaches captains meeting).

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...9ae714c4_m.jpg

Start of the game make a quick glance around the court as your verifying readiness of partners and tables.


During the course of play, you should notice untucked shirts unless the offending player is never involved in plays on the court. I'll try to make a mental note to look for it again at the next dead ball.


Anything blatant should be caught pretty easily.... Then again I notice beaver chews on a tree 300 yards off the road while going 70 lol

Off The Rails ...
 

I just noticed the title of this thread.

I apologize for taking it in a "high school direction".

I have worked exactly one college game (and exactly one FIBA game) in forty-five years.

I should stay in my lane, not be commenting on college issues, and be minding my own business.