![]() |
|
|||
|
9.12 SITUATION B: On the second of two free-throw attempts by A1, the ball is touched outside the cylinder by A2. RULING: No points can be scored. A2's actions are ruled a violation. A2 is also assessed a technical foul. Team B will be given two free throws. Following the free throws Team B will be awarded the ball for a designated spot throw-in at the division line opposite the table. (9-1 Penalty 1, 10-4-9)
Last year's book |
|
|||
|
Confirmed ...
Thanks SNIPERBBB and Raymond.
The last few posts have been very informative. ![]() It appears that the NFHS has intentionally and deliberately wiped clean any casebook play referencing offensive goaltending on a free throw. So getting rid of a technical foul for such action was not an unintended consequence, or an oversight, but an intentional and deliberate decision. That's probably enough confirmation for me. It’s really true, there really is no longer any such action as offensive goaltending, for a field goal try, a pass, or a free throw attempt. At least we found three past casebook plays, that while worded slightly different, did tell us that the NFHS did, at one time, consider such a situation, it's not like counting angels dancing on the head of a pin. The recent IAABO "word salad" clarification regarding free throw goaltending is still confusing me, but I'm now pretty sure that there is, indeed, no longer any offensive goaltending.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) Last edited by BillyMac; Tue Dec 02, 2025 at 11:17am. |
|
|||
|
Let's Take A Poll ...
Quote:
Disagree with me? I've got a girls middle school game on Thursday and I want to be prepared if an offensive player "goaltends" a free throw.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) Last edited by BillyMac; Tue Dec 02, 2025 at 06:06pm. |
|
|||
|
I think if you review all the posts in this thread, you'll figure out who agrees with you and who doesn't. Or if there is a combination of agreeing with part of what you say but not something else.
I've said all I can say on the subject. There's nothing new I can say. What do you think based on what I've already posted? What do you think based on what you read in the rule and case books? Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
|
No Longer Any Offensive Goaltending ...
Quote:
There is no longer any offensive goaltending. Period. Until I hear otherwise.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) Last edited by BillyMac; Wed Dec 03, 2025 at 09:40am. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Goaltending | Scrapper1 | Basketball | 4 | Mon Sep 14, 2015 04:34pm |
| Goaltending | jc147119 | Basketball | 3 | Tue Dec 30, 2008 05:14pm |
| Offensive Goaltending? | wanja | Basketball | 24 | Sat Apr 05, 2008 09:17am |
| Offensive Goaltending: WHY? | rotationslim | Basketball | 26 | Tue Jun 15, 2004 07:23pm |
| Offensive Goaltending | ebayman00 | Basketball | 33 | Sat Apr 29, 2000 10:52pm |