Taunting T: Texas Tech/Houston

[ilyazhito]

Why should it matter? AFAIK, class A technical fouls (taunting is a Class A technical foul) are enforced with 2 free throws and the game resuming from the point of interruption, whether or not the ball is dead.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

Why should it matter? AFAIK, class A technical fouls (taunting is a Class A technical foul) are enforced with 2 free throws and the game resuming from the point of interruption, whether or not the ball is dead.

This is true. My point is that they treated the POI as though the TF followed an OOB violation. Strictly speaking, that’s not what happened; the TF occurred while the ball was live with no team in control.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ilyazhito]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

This is true. My point is that they treated the POI as though the TF followed an OOB violation. Strictly speaking, that’s not what happened; the TF occurred while the ball was live with no team in control.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In that case, the proper sequence would be 2 shots, possession to the team entitled to it based on the AP arrow, and a full reset of the shot clock (20 seconds if it was awarded to the team who would be in their frontcourt).

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

Why should it matter? AFAIK, class A technical fouls (taunting is a Class A technical foul) are enforced with 2 free throws and the game resuming from the point of interruption, whether or not the ball is dead.

So how should play have resumed after the technical foul free throws were shot?

Remember, you say it doesn't if matter the ball was dead or not.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk