The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond View Post
Per your description, there should have been a whistle for a violation.


As IAABO would say, “Let’s go to the video tape!”

The announcers even said something like, “Indiana picks it up so we’ll just go the other way.” They said it almost matter-of-factly which is why I thought maybe there had been a recent rule change I was unaware of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 09:46am
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,392
Let's Go To The Videotape ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
As IAABO would say, “Let’s go to the video tape!”
They stole this from Warner Wolf, a local news sports anchor in Washington, D.C. and New York City.

__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Fri Feb 14, 2020 at 10:55am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 10:43am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,561
I just saw the video. I can post this. But it seems like you can make a case that the defender has the ball secure, if that is the case then you would not call a violation or stop play. This to me is either way decision. If Iowa was near the ball or was contesting the possession of the ball, then I think you have to call a violation.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 02:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I just saw the video. I can post this. But it seems like you can make a case that the defender has the ball secure, if that is the case then you would not call a violation or stop play. This to me is either way decision. If Iowa was near the ball or was contesting the possession of the ball, then I think you have to call a violation.



Peace


That seemed to be the opinion of the announcers, too. But I would like to have a debate about this with the video. I don’t remember this being “bang bang.” The horn sounded mid-flight, then the try missed the rim. Plenty of time to process and then whistle the violation. I think this was a deliberate bending of the rule by the crew. Maybe this is something the assignor wants done in the Big Ten?

There’s no doubt a call here would have been a game interruptor. I’m just wondering if by bending the rules it’s not the top of a slippery slope?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 03:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
I've had a few of these situations in my college games.

Horn sounds while the ball is in flight, doesn't get iron, defense secures rebound, and no one blows except me.

I had to look up the rule once to make sure I wasn't crazy. One time I asked my partners in the dressing room, "That ball didn't hit the rim, right?"

"No."
"So it's a shot clock violation."
"Yes, technically."

I guess there are some MSU officials out there who won't blow this play dead and maybe some assigners want that, but any crew I am on we will have a whistle for a shot clock violation. It's not a game interrupter - what if you don't blow and the player who got the rebound has the ball snatched away from him before he can fully "secure" the ball?

I have not had this be an issue more often than not though.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 03:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
I think this was a deliberate bending of the rule by the crew.
Or maybe they just had a brain fart and/or thought it hit the rim.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 14, 2020, 03:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
Or maybe they just had a brain fart and/or thought it hit the rim.


Twice in one half? It happened again a few minutes later. On the other end. Hey, at least they were consistent!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 15, 2020, 04:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,038
I'd like to see that be a rule. If the defense gains control during a shot clock violation, then play on. Get rid of the game disruption.

Ex. Offense shoots, shot clock signals, airball shot is caught by defense. = play on.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA shot clock question Scrapper1 Basketball 15 Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:22pm
NCAA-W: Shot clock violation or Flagrant 1? jeschmit Basketball 4 Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:54am
NCAA shot clock question Mark Padgett Basketball 11 Tue Apr 06, 2010 08:02pm
NCAA shot clock question rulesmaven Basketball 6 Thu Feb 09, 2006 02:52pm
Question on shot clock violation jbandbb Basketball 2 Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1