The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Finally - Some TRUTH from Jay Bilas (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/104940-finally-some-truth-jay-bilas.html)

WhistlesAndStripes Thu Jan 23, 2020 01:56pm

Finally - Some TRUTH from Jay Bilas
 
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...9cf6a689db.jpg
Jay actually says something true - his opinion means NOTHING.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SC Official Thu Jan 23, 2020 03:23pm

Hey, the coaches put in the new rule about finishing all games even when the free throws wouldn't affect the outcome. That is their problem, and if they don't like it, they have no one to blame but themselves. Not the officials' fault for following the rules.

Camron Rust Thu Jan 23, 2020 04:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 1037038)
Hey, the coaches put in the new rule about finishing all games even when the free throws wouldn't affect the outcome. That is their problem, and if they don't like it, they have no one to blame but themselves. Not the officials' fault for following the rules.

I do not believe that (the point about shooting FTs) is applicable in this case because, they put 1 second back on the clock.

JRutledge Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 1037044)
I do not believe that (the point about shooting FTs) is applicable in this case because, they put 1 second back on the clock.

It has to do with the fact that the score should be the score.

I worked with someone today that works D1 and he said that in one of their staff meetings, there was a law firm that was brought in to discuss this very thing. They discussed how they had information on every official because there was a threatened lawsuit with the NCAA and a couple of conferences when an official ruled a last-second shot that would have affected the outcome of a betting line. The officials in this case never reviewed the situations and it involved one official in like a week's period of time. So there were people that were convinced that the official was in on some scheme. But the law firm had evidence that this situation was an anomaly. And both cases where blowouts or where the game's outcome was not in question. But the betters lost millions thinking that the NCAA allowed this to happen. So if the betting line would be affected, this is why this rule was put into place.


Peace

justacoach Sun Jan 26, 2020 12:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1037143)
It has to do with the fact that the score should be the score.

I worked with someone today that works D1 and he said that in one of their staff meetings, there was a law firm that was brought in to discuss this very thing. They discussed how they had information on every official because there was a threatened lawsuit with the NCAA and a couple of conferences when an official ruled a last-second shot that would have affected the outcome of a betting line. The officials in this case never reviewed the situations and it involved one official in like a week's period of time. So there were people that were convinced that the official was in on some scheme. But the law firm had evidence that this situation was an anomaly. And both cases where blowouts or where the game's outcome was not in question. But the betters lost millions thinking that the NCAA allowed this to happen. So if the betting line would be affected, this is why this rule was put into place.


Peace

I object...........

Hearsay

JRutledge Sun Jan 26, 2020 08:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by justacoach (Post 1037144)
I object...........

Hearsay

OK, point still stands. The rule is real.

Peace


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1