2019 NIT Plays (Video)
Play #1:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MAvqLaM4yvs" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> More to come if you make requests. I do not watch a lot of these games BTW. Peace |
Pretty easy one right there.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
IU alum here.
I don't understand the fouler's reaction. Dakich was right on, that foul has been called pretty consistently in games I've watched. |
I agree it has been consistently called all year. The question is was this correct?
The question becomes when does he no longer have possession of the ball. I am waiting to see teams adjust to this being called this way and run a fake hand off and have the defender plow over or into the offensive player who still has possession. As for this call, I think it was correct because I do thank the hand off had taken place already. This is evidenced by the Indiana players arm coming up as he makes contact. Intentional absolutely not, but a moving screen, yes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ball is irrelevant. Ball handler never came to a stop.
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Moderately related to post:
I tried to do a better job with the dribble handoffs this year as we are seeing more of them and I didn't think I had been reading them well before. Overall the more you see them and the more you are anticipating the ball carrier becoming a screener and making sure they meet the requirements for each its ok. I little tougher in 2 person as you are officiating on ball d, trying to pick up in coming competitive matchup and the ball carriers feet but if the game has good flow and its not random I'm getting better. This one seems pretty easy, as do the ones where they offense is clearly just washing out the intial defender. 2 areas I find difficult to adjudicate in these situations I would love assistance/feedback about: 1) If d team is switching everything. Then contact/moving elements from screener don't create disadvantage unless they are rolling through or washing out the switching defender. Would you call the act/contact the same regardless of how it was being defended? 2) As another poster brings up if the offense dribbles at the defense hesitates and the curler sprints by like the handoff if coming but the dribbler just keeps attacking in the direction of the running defender. There is some questionable time and space stuff that can happen and who is responsible for contact can get tricky if the play gets blown up. |
Quote:
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21am. |