St. Louis/Virginia Tech Blarge
 

Anyone remember the time this occurred? If not I’ll look it up in the morning.

First half at 13:20?

I think this is better from the NCAA's or CBS's point of view
 

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mgD4gbgZheY" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Unfortunately it shows as blocked at this time.

Thanks for your efforts with these JRut.

I changed the video and cut down a lot of the stuff in the video. I think their issue might be the length of the videos and some of the commentary. So far this other video has no issues.

Peace

I did not notice this was a triple whistle as well. That brings in another level of conversation too.

Peace

Obligatory “this is why you always have a thorough pregame” post.

Glad we got that out of the way.

C should have the only whistle on this. PC foul was the correct call.

There is no reason for the L and T to have a whistle, but at least the T held his prelim.

That's funny:D

Incorrect. This is a secondary defender play so the lead is primary on this in the NCAA-M and the high school states that use the RA. The lead does a good job mechanically on this play other than being aware the Center has a call. The Center makes the error by not posting and holding.

Not every secondary defender is Lead’s. This defender is well outside the lane line and very far up the lane from the Lead. Slots play all day long.

L has secondary defenders in the lane. This play is nowhere near the paint and C is all over it. Plus the L has the worst look on the crew of this crash. T has a much better chance of getting this play correct if C passes.

I'm fine with the L looking over there since there wasn't much going on in his primary, but this is not his play. And he got it wrong; the defender did nothing wrong.

Also waiting for the obligatory argument from one of our posters about how a double foul isn't required to be assessed.