Vid Request: Mich State vs Perdue - hook/hold = F1

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Especially when you publish a new rule with certain criteria then send out a bulletin that says that criteria doesn't really apply.

Soooo....this video sequence is not a good example of a hook/hold???

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

Soooo....this video sequence is not a good example of a hook/hold???

I haven't seen the video yet. I was just commenting to the "growing pains" statement. The growing pains are self induced by Art Hyland.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Raymond

I haven't seen the video yet. I was just commenting to the "growing pains" statement. The growing pains are self induced by Art Hyland.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

I just viewed the video for the first time (I only watched the beginning to see the foul). Based on the rule that was written in the rulebook I don't have an F1. I'm not even sure if it's hook and hold.

But if the officials judged it was a hook and hold, Art Hyland put out a bulletin telling us to make it F1 automatically.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[sdoebler]

Only thing I would add is that this was not a "make-up call." Clear displacement cause by the black player on the rebound.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by sdoebler

Only thing I would add is that this was not a "make-up call." Clear displacement cause by the black player on the rebound.

This is why you do not listen to commentators, coaches or players for that matter. They think that we do things with an agenda. A clear foul was called on the rebounding action after the FF1. Even if I dislike the FF1 being called, why would I make another call I did not like. BTW, all three officials looked at the play and must have drawn a similar conclusion. It is a dumb rule, but that is the rule. The best way to change a rule is to keep calling it.

Peace