Vid Request: Mich State vs Perdue - hook/hold = F1

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by deecee

It's a new rule and concept. Expect growing pains and tweaking in the off season...

Especially when you publish a new rule with certain criteria then send out a bulletin that says that criteria doesn't really apply.

[SC Official]

The coaches write the rules.

Couldn't get through the video without a "make up call" assertion on the obvious rebounding foul by Purdue.

[Rich]

As someone who has no stake in the college game, I'll say this:

Ridiculous interpretation that simply needs to be acknowledged as a mistake and quietly go away.

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Rich

As someone who has no stake in the college game, I'll say this:

Ridiculous interpretation that simply needs to be acknowledged as a mistake and quietly go away.

+1 - it would be nice if the announcers understood or comprehended who sets the damn rules and expectations in the first place. Their heads would explode if they found out it was the coaches and teams.

[JRutledge]

It is their rule. We just enforce it. And they gave the D1 level, for the most part, the ability to review this. It does not matter how silly we feel it is.

Still waiting for the screen/blowup double foul to take place. I have not seen one yet.

Peace

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Especially when you publish a new rule with certain criteria then send out a bulletin that says that criteria doesn't really apply.

Soooo....this video sequence is not a good example of a hook/hold???

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

Soooo....this video sequence is not a good example of a hook/hold???

I haven't seen the video yet. I was just commenting to the "growing pains" statement. The growing pains are self induced by Art Hyland.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Raymond

I haven't seen the video yet. I was just commenting to the "growing pains" statement. The growing pains are self induced by Art Hyland.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

I just viewed the video for the first time (I only watched the beginning to see the foul). Based on the rule that was written in the rulebook I don't have an F1. I'm not even sure if it's hook and hold.

But if the officials judged it was a hook and hold, Art Hyland put out a bulletin telling us to make it F1 automatically.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[sdoebler]

Only thing I would add is that this was not a "make-up call." Clear displacement cause by the black player on the rebound.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by sdoebler

Only thing I would add is that this was not a "make-up call." Clear displacement cause by the black player on the rebound.

This is why you do not listen to commentators, coaches or players for that matter. They think that we do things with an agenda. A clear foul was called on the rebounding action after the FF1. Even if I dislike the FF1 being called, why would I make another call I did not like. BTW, all three officials looked at the play and must have drawn a similar conclusion. It is a dumb rule, but that is the rule. The best way to change a rule is to keep calling it.

Peace