Dead ball technical
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0F7creYWCd4" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Was this contact dead ball technical foul handled / called correctly? The audio isn't synced perfectly with the video, so don't go by that for the sound of the whistle. This is the scenario: Coppin player (#1) gets an offensive rebound and is fouled shooting the putback. After the whistle, Bethune Cookman #2 swings and connects to the mouth of a Coppin player (#22), knocking him down, and drawing blood. For a long time, it appeared they weren't going to do a monitor review. They eventually did. The monitor review portion isn't in the video, but, upon review, they called a common shooting foul on Bethune and a contact dead ball technical foul on Bethune. #21 Coppin was the player selected to shoot the technical free throws. Was all this handled/administered/called correctly? Thanks. |
I may be going off of old knowledge because I thought they did away with the CDBT definition and replaced it with something else. Under the old CDBT penalties as I knew them, order of occurrence superseded point of interruption (just as it does for F2 techs). So in this case, I think they got the FT sequence correct, but then gave the ball OOB to the wrong team at the wrong spot.
Again, I’m basing this off of what I know would have been correct last year. Not sure if it still is this year. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Tech for the dead ball contact is correct. Shoot the original shooting foul first, then shoot the tech, any player may shoot. Offended team gets the ball at the division line either side.
|
Another classic example of "I-got-a-foul-so-I-will-hold-my-fist-in-the-air-for-a-long-time-lest-I-forget.":rolleyes:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
(Coach Bill, I sent you a PM) |
Eventually My Arm Gets Tired ...
... and I bring it down.
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51pm. |