Technical Foul given during free throw administration (Video)

[JRutledge]

Let us discuss if or how this could have been prevented if it could have been prevented.

Just an interesting play of dead ball officiating.



Peace

[packersowner]

Looks like #0 - Fleming needs some extra wind sprints.

From what we can see, white and purple were discussing American Lit before the 1st shot. It appears the L moved in to ensure they weren't talking about Hamilton because he has show tickets for the weekend, at which point #0 jumps into the conversation.

Without knowing what was said, seems like a justified T and I am not sure what else preventative could have happened.

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by packersowner

Looks like #0 - Fleming needs some extra wind sprints.

From what we can see, white and purple were discussing American Lit before the 1st shot. It appears the L moved in to ensure they weren't talking about Hamilton because he has show tickets for the weekend, at which point #0 jumps into the conversation.

Without knowing what was said, seems like a justified T and I am not sure what else preventative could have happened.

Pretty much.

I called a similar T a few years ago in a HS game. I'm talking to two guys to diffuse a situation, then the 3rd guy comes in being a tough guy trying to get in a few words to the opponent. Like, dude....I'm standing right here. No Sir, STFU and let's explain to your coach why you cost your team 2 points and a possession.

[nolanjj68]

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

The video doesn't show for me (there's just a hole where the video should be), so I don't know the level, but many rules codes have a T as being "shoot immediately and then resume at point-of-interruption" rule

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

Because non-contact/non-flagrant technical fouls are POI in NCAA-Men's.

[nolanjj68]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Because non-contact/non-flagrant technical fouls are POI in NCAA-Men's.

Thanks. So in NFHS we would continue with the 2nd of the 1 and 1 and then administer the Tech FTs, correct?

[Raymond]

There is an obviously unnecessary push by Blue 15 during the first free throw, that's what drew the Lead's attention.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by nolanjj68

Can someone explain why they did not finish the 2nd free throw of the 1 and 1 before shooting the technical free throws?

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The video doesn't show for me (there's just a hole where the video should be), so I don't know the level, but many rules codes have a T as being "shoot immediately and then resume at point-of-interruption" rule

Around 2:12 in the video, the shows the POI second free throw was taken.

This is a typical NCAA Men's application of the rule. Almost all technicals in NCAA Men's are POI application. Dead ball contact technicals, for example, are treated like a high school in the application of the technical (two shots and the ball).

Peace

[Camron Rust]

I presume he was in there to start with because he heard something going on between them that needed to be addressed. The only way it could have been prevented would be to have not gone in there to address whatever started it. But then, we might be having a different discussion about what could have happened.

[Altor]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Let us discuss if or how this could have been prevented if it could have been prevented.

Blue 0 could have prevented it by keeping his comments to himself, most likely.