UCLA @ Oregon Plays (Video)
 

Play #1
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WLSTKUD3bPQ" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #2
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aiat-SDYqYI" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #3
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oV4A18DwVKI" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #4
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jnteRWexv34" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #5
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/94OJ4IHhV4Y" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

1. Not sure but I can tell you that it was not tipped on the pass, Dave Hall specifically points to the UCLA player in the back court saying he touched it before the Oregon player. Don't have an angle to verify.

2. I like the double T, cut the crap out.

3. PC

4. I think this is just a common foul. He went for the ball on the foul and when the whistle went off he stayed on to prevent an easy and 1.

5. I watched this game live and didn't even notice this. He ends up hitting the backboard with his outside hand that wasn't even an attempt to block. Watching this after I could see issuing a technical for slapping the backboard but would be a very difficult call to make in real time.

1. So very close. No real issue with not calling that. Can't really tell, even in slow-motion, who touched that first.

2. Like the double T's. Clean that crap up early!

The PC call looks solid to me. Not so sure about the FF1...don't think I would call that an INT in HS game.

1. Very tough to tell from the angle provided.

2. Good calls.

3. PC, easily.

4. Good FF1. He held onto him after not getting the ball to make sure the player couldn't complete the shot. Not a basketball play.

5. Nothing....insignificant.

1. Difficult to tell. If in doubt play on. I liked that the official
communicated that he felt blue touched it first in the bc.
2. Good call and excellent job of staying with and identifying the players and
their numbers.
3. PC
4. I would go with intentional.
5. Nothing.

Is #3 even close to not being a PC?

+1

1.Can't really tell, even in slow-motion, who touched that first. If we can't tell even in slo-mo it would be hard to have a whistle.

2. Well deserved.

3. No doubt - PC

4. I'm not going Intentional on that. Appears to be a play on the ball in my opinion that is not excessive. Hard to come up with that from behind the play too.

5. That is basket interference.

Which part do you think is BI? The player touching the backboard or the rebounding on the other side?