Duke @ Miami play (Video)
 

Play #1:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4NieGfZ6F_0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #2:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ggcPeCxJ36s" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #3:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6idy72Q7CjU" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

1. Probably a foul, but not the easiest call in the world.

2. Heck no he wasn’t vertical. Looked like it on the main camera angle, but that’s why we put leads on end lines.

3. Great no-call. Point A to B, but due to offensive player’s contact. Defender did everything right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1. The initial contact is on the hand that is on the ball -- legal. Subsequent contact is after the ball became loose and didn't affect White's ability to get the ball. Legal.

2. Good foul.

3. I'm not up on all the intricacies of NCAAM RA but (1) I'm not sure the player was a secondary defender and (2) even if he was he appeard to jump slightly backwards -- so I have this as legal.

He would be considered a secondary defender on this play, but he was most definitely legal in defending the shot.

You are not considered in the RA when you jump or "wall up" as a defender. Then you are judged as any other kind of defender as if you were outside the RA.

Peace

1. Don't think this one was a foul. The initial camera was too far to tell. Replays were closer.

2. Good call

3. Good straight up and down jump.

Play 1: Contact on the arm first that slid up to the ball, knocking it out. That should have been a foul.

Play 2: Not vertical...Foul.

Play 3: Good defense.