Arizona @ Utah plays (Video)
Play #1:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cN9GAf9x1SM" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe> Peace |
I don't know if I would consider that contact illegal.
|
RA blocking foul, Larry needs to un-twist his panties.
|
I have no call. That's not a call the L should make, has no angle on anything.
|
Not an RA block. By point to the RA, it implies that this would have been a charge except that red was in the RA -- and I don't think that's the case at all.
I thought on one of the views that maybe red didn't get to the spot before blue was airborne and thus didn't give blue a spot to land (and blue stumbles). on a different view, that doesn't seem to be the case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Arem is correct. Contact on a shooter by a grounded secondary defender is by rule a foul on the defender. Crap rule, easy correct call.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I actually see why he called this, but I think it was not what I would want to call personally if a big guy is standing his ground on a little guy that basically bounced off of him. Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Not an NCAA official, but we can parse this six ways to Sunday with NCAA rules and I’d still have a no call. I think this is one the L wants back and I think he knew it right away (evidenced by the oversell and the rope he gave to the coach).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
JD is pretty clear in the coaches rules training video from this summer that the defender must jump and may not remain grounded in the RA to contest the shot.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xZ5dNWuZkVo?rel=0&start=811" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43am. |