Ignore Throw-In on This One?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Freddy

B1 commits an intentional foul on A1 who is in the act of shooting. After that but before the ball becomes dead, B2 commits his team's seventh foul against A2.

Is this to be considered a false multiple foul with the penalties administered in the order that the fouls occurred?

(Justification warning)

Yes -- but the "penalty" for the IP includes a throw-in, so that part of the penalty isn't lost (unless there's some subsequent foul by A that includes a throw-in for B).

[so cal lurker]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

(Justification warning)

Yes -- but the "penalty" for the IP includes a throw-in, so that part of the penalty isn't lost (unless there's some subsequent foul by A that includes a throw-in for B).

So it would be:

2 FT for A1 with the lane clear for the intentional foul
1-and-1 for A2 with the lane clear for the 7th foul
TI for A (which goes back to the first foul)?

[Freddy]

Originally Posted by so cal lurker

So it would be:

2 FT for A1 with the lane clear for the intentional foul
1-and-1 for A2 with the lane clear for the 7th foul
TI for A (which goes back to the first foul)?

If we follow "order of occurrence", it would be:

FT's for A1 for the intentional foul with the lanes cleared
1-and-1 for A2 with the lanes occupied and play resuming as a result

Right?

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by Freddy

If we follow "order of occurrence", it would be:

FT's for A1 for the intentional foul with the lanes cleared
1-and-1 for A2 with the lanes occupied and play resuming as a result

Right?

This is correct. These fouls weren't simultaneous. order of occurrence is right way to do it.