NCAA Tourn Friday March 24 video requests

[OKREF]

Baylor/SC 10:41 2nd half. Block/Charge. Looks like a PC.

[Nevadaref]

1:26 left in 2nd half of Bulter/UNC
Butler player drives from the wing and scores.
Did he dribble after going airborne or keep a foot down?

UCLA/Kentucky
8:46 first half
Alley-oop attempt by UCLA, undercut by UK player. First they line the players up for 2 shots, then go OOB throw-in.

Should this be shooting or not?

[ODog]

Originally Posted by AremRed

UCLA/Kentucky
8:46 first half
Alley-oop attempt by UCLA, undercut by UK player. First they line the players up for 2 shots, then go OOB throw-in.

Should this be shooting or not?

Player who was fouled never had the ball. Officials correctly came to their senses. You can't assume an alley-oop.

[ODog]

UCLA/UK, first half, 8:33. UCLA player commits a blatant travel en route to a monster dunk.

My question isn't whether it's a travel, since we would all agree it is. My question is: Would this be considered a "gotcha" travel at this level? I was kind of surprised at the no-call, since this was not a quick one either. More of a slow-developing, easy-to-identify travel.

Just trying to calibrate my own meter

Originally Posted by ODog

My question is: Would this be considered a "gotcha" travel at this level?)

Yup.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ODog

UCLA/UK, first half, 8:33. UCLA player commits a blatant travel en route to a monster dunk.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Peace

I've seen that called about 50% of the time this year. In past years, not so much. They're calling it a bit tighter now but don't always catch it.

Originally Posted by ODog

Player who was fouled never had the ball. Officials correctly came to their senses. You can't assume an alley-oop.

He didn't possess the ball but he did get his fingertips to it. Could we say he is trying to tap the ball?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ODog

Player who was fouled never had the ball. Officials correctly came to their senses. You can't assume an alley-oop.

No, I think it was a travel and should be called. But it might be hard to see as you are looking at the contact. Seen too many videos that travels should be called.

Peace

[ODog]

UCLA/UK, 17:50 left. Block/charge no-call.

[Badgerfan2]

Nigel Hayes called for charge, about 4 minutes left in first half, looked like a botched call.

[crosscountry55]

This is a good one. Wisconsin/Florida. Just before 15:06 2nd Half.

FL try in flight. W22 commits pushing foul during rebounding action under the basket, so ball remains live. Then F12 appears to commit offensive BI by getting his hand entangled in the net while the ball was on/within the basket. The try ends up being successful.

Crew gets together to discuss. It could very well be that they just weren't sure who's hand ended up in the net because W22's was in the neighborhood as well. But replay clearly showed that it was F12's hand. In any case, they counted the basket, which I believe was incorrect.

Should have been wipe the basket, but then give the ball to FL for a throw-in as a result of the common foul.

After the lengthy discussion, the crew forgot who the initial foul was on, so they went to the monitor to confirm W22. In the subsequent explanation to the TV crew (which I like that they do, by the way), it was even asked about the pulling on the net, and the official correctly stated, "no, that part of the call is not reviewable."

So this time Rule 11 was applied correctly, but the inability to apply common sense with replay review here gave FL two free points.

Yeah, I definitely think some major tweaking to Rule 11 is in order after this year.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ODog

UCLA/UK, 17:50 left. Block/charge no-call.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by AremRed

UCLA/Kentucky
8:46 first half
Alley-oop attempt by UCLA, undercut by UK player. First they line the players up for 2 shots, then go OOB throw-in.

Should this be shooting or not?

Peace