Louisville @ North Carolina plays (Video)

[JRutledge]

Play #1:


Play #2:


Play #3:



Peace

Play 1: No travel, right foot is pivot.

Play 2: No foul, defender makes contact with the ball first and the rest of the contact is incidental.

Play 3: A player is clearly requesting timeout but the official cannot take his eyes off the play. Unfortunate, perhaps the other officials could have helped.

[Rich]

On #1, I think it's pretty clear watching the video that the left foot's the pivot and he returns it to the floor.

[JRutledge]

Play 4 & 5:



Peace

[JRutledge]

Play #6:



Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Rich

On #1, I think it's pretty clear watching the video that the left foot's the pivot and he returns it to the floor.

Agree...the ball was clearly at rest in his hand when the left was the pivot.

#2, no call is OK, the ball was already bounding away and he was not going to get to it. The contact was incidental.

#3, that official had the worst case of tunnel vision. The player did everything he could to request the timeout short of smacking the official in the face. That should have been a timeout.

#4, yes, it was a travel, but very subtle. Not likely called.

#5. Defender didn't have LGP, first contact would have been a block. Then the the shooter pushed off. Hard to call the push off if not calling the block.

#6. The official was inbounds. It was close, but I think it should have been Louisville's ball since there was an inadvertent whistle before NC gained control of the ball.

[Da Official]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Agree...the ball was clearly at rest in his hand when the left was the pivot.

#2, no call is OK, the ball was already bounding away and he was not going to get to it. The contact was incidental.

#3, that official had the worst case of tunnel vision. The player did everything he could to request the timeout short of smacking the official in the face. That should have been a timeout.

#4, yes, it was a travel, but very subtle. Not likely called.

#5. Defender didn't have LGP, first contact would have been a block. Then the the shooter pushed off. Hard to call the push off if not calling the block.

#6. The official was inbounds. It was close, but I think it should have been Louisville's ball since there was an inadvertent whistle before NC gained control of the ball.

Agree with Cam on every call...

[OKREF]

On 6, he doesn't blow his whistle until the NC player has the ball. Isn't that why NC gets the ball, otherwise the IW would have been a loose ball and Louisville would have retained possession.

[youngump]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

#6. The official was inbounds. It was close, but I think it should have been Louisville's ball since there was an inadvertent whistle before NC gained control of the ball.

Is whether the ball was out reviewable on video? It wasn't an inadvertent whistle, just a wrong one.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by youngump

Is whether the ball was out reviewable on video? It wasn't an inadvertent whistle, just a wrong one.

He thought he was OOB, points NC direction, points at Louisville player and says off him. They went to video to see if he was OOB. This has to be ruled as an inadvertent whistle for NC to get the ball back.