![]() |
Video Request Pitt vs Ohmah-Nebraska
Both clips in the second half 11:29 foul on Nix. It appeared that Nix was called for a block because he is a big guy but my first thought was that he had LGP.
Second clip 2:15. Wondering about the monitor use. There was no foul called on the play. |
Quote:
Peace |
The game was on the ACC network (Watch ESPN app or espn3.com)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8aBEDrOLk_8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Peace |
Quote:
If I was forced to call a foul it was be on Black-32, but there really was not foul be either player. MTD, Sr. |
He does call a block. All I can figure is he waited to see if ball was going in on the shot. He may have called white for a bump on the shooter. There wasn't anything on the rebound.
Did the shooter get two FTs after this? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have the full game downloaded and I saw multiple replays showing 25 turning his body into the shooter. Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk |
As for the play at 2:15 of the second half, they go to the monitor to see if there is cause for a flagrant or dead-ball technical on W25 after a travel is called on the opposing team.
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk |
He is not calling a foul on the rebound. He is calling a RA block.
Secondary defender grounded in the RA - correctly called a block. It just looks bad / confusing because it is called so late. However, a correct call. The lead is caught in "no mans land" on the drive, or else he probably does a better job picking up secondary defender in RA. |
Quote:
And going back and looking at the video, the shooter was the guy going to the basket #44 and not the guy rebounding. But his signal and whistle confused the situation and the commentators as well. Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Feeling like Rodney Dangerfield here. LOL Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the way, Rodney is still one of my all time favorites. I pull up his old routines on youtube quite often! |
Finally!!!!
Quote:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/k8N7B1NOsAk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Peace |
IMO:
I'd have a blocking foul...regardless. If the B2 wasn't in the RA I'd have him turning into the opponent. Still you have B2 a secondary defender in the RA...who remained grounded...and the contact is more than incidental. I'd want the lead having first crack at this...secondary defender...in the paint...this is his bread and butter. I've had assignor say to officiate this feet up in order to pick up the location of the secondary defender. Once you do that you can adjudicate the probably block/charge.....grounded/alighted...incidental/illegal. It's a lot to take in but it's also why it's been harped that the outside officials must have opinions on these plays. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47am. |