Revised Rule 4-42-5a

[Shooter14]

Originally Posted by Freddy

Sorry, I meant 6-4-5, which says, "The opportunity to make an AP throw-in is lost if the throw-in team violates. . . . If the defensive team commits a violation during the throw-in, the possession arrow is not switched."

So, even if the word "legally" is removed from 4-42-5a, what 6-4-5 says means everything is the same as it's always been.

I prefer that they had left the word "legally" there, but someone must have said, "Hey, since 6-4-5 covers this eventuality, let's just remove this word." Duh.

Does that make sense to you?

There it is. Ok that makes sense now. We kept looking at 6.4.2 last night thinking "what the heck is this guy talking about" ha. Man I just don't understand why they would take the word "legally" out. What does that gain? If anything, it made it more confusing to me. But I see it now.

[Shooter14]

I honestly think the reason I didn't read that part of the book while testing last night is because that's right where that "referee magazine" advertisement is and I must have kept skipping over it since it was the very next page. ha.

[Shooter14]

If it' s correct that mean's I missed a different one on the test. I have no clue which one I could have missed. That was seriously the only one I was back and forth on.