Foul in the act of shooting, or not

[SAK]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Many uninformed HS officials wrongly fail to award the goal in part (a) believing that only the circumstances of part (b) warrant counting it when there is an off-ball defensive foul. Don't be one of these guys! Know the continuous motion rule and it's proper application.
NFHS Casebook ruling 6.7 Situation D is your best rule reference.

I was not looking for the continuous motion though that is a good reference and I think answered my question. What I was looking for is a case in which A5 (in this case) shoots the "and one." From Casebook ruling 6.7 situation E (in the 2015-2016 case book as I have no D, but believe it to be the same situation) seems to cover it as if this was the case A5 would shoot one and that is not what the case book has happening.