Cincinnati and St. Joseph last play of the game.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

This is correct for a HS game and for an NCAAW game with no monitor.

IF, in NCAAW, there is a monitor and the whistle was before the horn, put that time back up on the clock, count the basket, shoot 1 FT. I *think* the NCAAM rule is (substantially) the same.

Yes it's the same Bob

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

... NCAAW, there is a monitor and the whistle was before the horn, put that time back up on the clock, count the basket, shoot 1 FT.

As a curious, journeyman, high school official, that doesn't ever have access to a video review, I have to ask: Whistle? Or the actual foul?

[Nevadaref]

The NCAA ruling a few years ago was to use the monitor to restore the clock to the time of the contact for the foul and it did not matter whether the whistle was sounded before or after the horn. All that mattered was that the contact occurred prior to the expiration of time.

Perhaps one of our current NCAAM officials will come verify it that is still the case or if it has changed.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

The NCAA ruling a few years ago was to use the monitor to restore the clock to the time of the contact for the foul and it did not matter whether the whistle was sounded before or after the horn. All that mattered was that the contact occurred prior to the expiration of time.

Perhaps one of our current NCAAM officials will come verify it that is still the case or if it has changed.

It is still the case.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

As a curious, journeyman, high school official, that doesn't ever have access to a video review, I have to ask: Whistle? Or the actual foul?

The NCAAW answer is "whistle."

And it's why I said the rulings were "(substantially) the same."

[JRutledge]

Peace