SC Official Would like to get another look at the lane violation called at 5:20 in the first half. Particularly curious if the proper official made the call under NCAAM mechanics.
BlueDevilRef It looked weird live and I rewound it several times. I agree he stepped over his lane line with his left foot, but seemed official pointed emphatically at right foot.
JRutledge Well he has that side of the lane as the C. I have no issues with the violation or the call. He is telling everyone he has a violation on the offensive player. BTW, video is coming so we can discuss visually. Peace
johnny d JRutledge wrote BTW, video is coming so we can discuss visually. Peace I am eager to see how we are going to do that😃
BlueDevilRef I agree it was correct. Just looks like he crossed with left foot first. Maybe Sirmons saw other the right foot first. But I think if was a good call
SC Official This was a violation, but would be the L's call in NFHS. Are NCAAM mechanics different for this?
JRutledge SC Official wroteThis was a violation, but would be the L's call in NFHS. Are NCAAM mechanics different for this? No, but I have no problem with him making this call. It looked pretty obvious that there was a violation here from his point of view. Peace
Nevadaref SC Official wroteThis was a violation, but would be the L's call in NFHS. Are NCAAM mechanics different for this? At the NCAA level the L and C have responsibility for the violations committed by players on the OPPOSITE side of the FT lane. This may have been a correct call, but it came from the wrong official.