UAB/UTEP Women's ending
 

Anybody post the video? Half court 3 at the buzzer in OT waived off. Losing coach in the press conference alluded to conversation with the official about what clock was used to determine if the shot was good. Different from whatever he was looking at. Got any info on this?

I was able to stop the video when the lights around the backboard came on, and the ball was still in her hands. Not sure about NCAAW rules, but in high school the shot is no good based on that info.

NCAA 5-7-2a (it's the same rule number for Women and Men):

They (the team) were probably looking at the shot in the youtube video where the clock was inlaid on the main video. Never trust those. There is almost always a delay on that clock. There was a view from the backcourt where you could see the ball in her hand and the clock above the goal at 0.0 and the red LEDs on. That's the definitive look.

Here is a breakdown.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8MkNy6cm2oI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Thanks for posting the video. I can see the red light on before the shot leaves her hands.

Umm...you folks did see the NCAA rule citation I added to the thread earlier, right?

Yes, and?

The game clock above the basket in the same shot as the ball showed 0.0 before she released it. It shouldn't have counted.

The officials most likely could not clearly see the clock at 0.0, the ball and whether it was on her hand all in the same low-angle shot (I know I couldn't, though I was watching on a much smaller screen). They apparently went with the next-best angle (at 0:39 of the YouTube clip) which shows the ball out of the shooter's hands with 0:00.1 on the superimposed game clock. That's why the goal was ruled good. My guess is that's what the coach was alluding to about the clock and the angle. If the officials were wrong I'm sure I'll see something about it on Arbiter within a day or two.

Now, whether the superimposed clock was a beat behind those attached to the baskets is another story but it appears the crew went with the most definitive information available.

The question about my earlier post was also concerned with the references to the LED lights. Those lights weren't relevant in this case based on the rule and the equipment available.

You mean it was not ruled good?

That only applies when you go to the monitor. During live action on the court we use the red light and the horn.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

My comment agreed with your rule citation.

From the Youtube description...

Apologies to all for misunderstanding the outcome. Ugh. Don't know where my head was.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk