Does 7-5-4 Trump 7-5-7?
 

A1 attempts a shot from beyond the arc. While the ball is in the air, a foul is called on A2 for illegal contact with B2. After the whistle, A1's attempt is good.
Does (A) Team B get a 7-5-7 throw-in, able to "run the endline" because it follows a made basket? Or does (B) Team B get a designated spot throw-in nearest the foul because it follows a common foul prior to the bonus?
I don't think I got this right last night. Thought there was a casebook citation, of perhaps an Interp, on it but . . .

When in doubt the rules do have some logic built in. Why would you give Team B a designated-spot throw-in when Team B didn't do anything wrong?

I do not want to lean on logic and reason if there is some casebook or Interp citation out there that speaks to the situation. That's what I'm trying to verify . . . if anyone knows of one.

SITUATION 3: While Al’s three-point field-goal attempt is in flight, A3 fouls B1 (B is not in the bonus) near the bottom block area. The three-point field-goal attempt is successful. RULING: Score the three-point goal for Al. Team B will be permitted to run the end line on the ensuing throw-in. (5-7-7 Exp (2); 7-5-7)

Just a funny sidenote not having to do with the topic at hand. Sorry...

I have the Drumpfinator app for Chrome, which... if you don't know... changes the word "Trump" to "Drumpf" (you can look up the reason for that if you want) so the title of this thread read "Does 7-5-4 Drumpf 7-5-7?". :D

If the foul would result in a throw-in spot on the endline, then Team B may run. If the foul would result in a sideline throw-in spot, it must remain there and be a spot throw-in.

Isn't Trump trumping everything these days.......

7-5-4 does not CRUZ past 7-5-7

it doesn't cause you to feel the BERN past 7-5-7 nor does it go over the Hill compared to 7-5-7

Note: This is not an endorsement of any political candidate just a little play on words...I know that the moderators get a little funny about political statements...

Dewey Wins!!!

Dewey Wins !!!!
 

Touche my friend !!!!!

Try 7.5.7 Situation C.

Duh. 7.5.7E. Exact situation.

E answers the original question, but C illustrates (I think) the distinction between end line and spot TI that Nevadaref pointed out in post #6.

Your signature covers all of the candidates already, every time.

I was actually born the day this headline came out. It was the day after the 1948 election. The paper is the Chicago Tribune and I was born in Chicago, so this is my hometown newspaper headline the day I was born. How prophetic. Oh yeah - one of these papers is on display in the National Archives in Washington D.C.

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/200...eatstruman.jpg

I'm with Nevada, if the foul is not near the end line, it will be a designated spot throw-in.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk