Ohio State v Iowa Couple play requests
 

Double foul with about 1 minute left in the 2nd half. I thought it should have been double T's.

Final 6 seconds Ohio player runs over screen no call.

Good chance that the Iowa player got hit in the head on the drive to the basket as well.

Iowa @ Ohio State (Video)
 

Here is the play in total.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RkiTEh3norI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Great no-call on the screen. It was legally set and did what it was designed to do. The screened player doesn't have to avoid contact on a blind screen like that.

And on the final shot...he may have touched the hair, but that was a great blocked shot. No call from me on that.

Play 2:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZP6ekaf9jdM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play 3:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VtVZ6ZyXHMs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Where do you get that from?

--------

Rut how about the double foul at about 1 minute left in the second half during a dead ball that they didn't call double T's?

The only foul would be on the Ohio player. I have no foul on a player that set the screen as he was there and gave time and distance IMO.

Peace

Yes I agree. I was asking Camron where he got his ruling from.

What I'm asking you is that at about 1 minute remaining in the second half there was a made basket and a tustle after the fact that was called a double foul versus double T's.

That's the video I was asking for.

Rule 4-40-7.

Here is the play....(Video)
 

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QXPk2V___T8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

For the double foul, the contact starts before the ball enters the basket. The fling by the Iowa player comes after.
If a double foul is called (as it was in the game), it should be personal. Otherwise, a case can be made for a single DBCTF against Iowa.

Camron this doesn't exist in the ncaam rulebook and I can't find anything similar.

But it's good to know for HS, thanks.

It is in the NCAA-M book as well, you need to look harder. Also, this has been covered in one of Adam's videos. Look through the archive, you will find the play. Camron has it exactly right.

From the 2015-16 NCAAM Rulebook pg. 54
It's clear that the Iowa player stood wider than his shoulder width apart but such a tough play to call being in transition with all the factors the T has to officiate; I can understand the no-call.

I don't care how wide the legs are if the contact is square in the torso -- I only care about the width of the legs when the screened player hits or goes over the outstretched leg.