Iowa @ Indiana Flagrant Foul Review

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Legacy Zebra

As someone who doesn't officiate basketball, what's the proper administration if the double dribble is called there? If it was a common foul I would guess that it would be ignored. But is the FF1 ignored, too? Or would he still get to shoot for it?

If a violation or another foul took place on this play, the play would be dead. And the only way you could call a foul if the action continued was intentional or flagrant in nature. If the whistle was blown I would bet all the players would have stopped on some level. At best I think nothing more would be called if there was a violation called.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Legacy Zebra

As someone who doesn't officiate basketball, what's the proper administration if the double dribble is called there? If it was a common foul I would guess that it would be ignored. But is the FF1 ignored, too? Or would he still get to shoot for it?

It would be nothing in this case because it was only an FF1 due to neutralizing an obvious advantageous position. If the ball is dead, the position no longer has an advantage. If it were a FF due to excessive contact, it would stand and become a technical foul for dead ball contact.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

2nd video...double dribble. Someone had to say it.

yes, it was....or a carry (same thing). Either way, if the play had continued he may have improved his advantageous position with that move party by freezing the other defenders that had a chance to defend him.