Louisville @ Duke - Video Reviews
 

Illegal Screen play in this game.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0Knxvi3NzNY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

I don't believe 32B gave 3W a step.....but it looks like 3W does see it coming and almost turns his body to make it seem further out of his field of vision that it actually was.

Still think its a good call though.

Are you attempting to make some point with this video post?

No. It is a basic play we all have to see and potentially call. When I post things I post them for discussion purposes, not to drive and agenda like some people.

It was just a play I found interesting. Discuss away.

Peace

Flagrant Foul 1 Review
 

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QozgtO2xtD8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Let's Go To The Videotape ...
 

JRutledge is a recent addition to the list of Forum members who post videos. Let's just sit back, observe, analyze, learn, discuss, and enjoy. I don't have the ability, nor do I have the time, to post such videos, so I appreciate those that do.

The tripping is SO blatant. You have to love the official who is standing right there, yet never bothers to look down at the player on the floor. Where does he think contac might occur--on the dribbler's head? :(

+1

Thanks, Rut, JetMet and others for the vids. The ensuing discussion is fantastic too.

(sarcasm on)

This play is indicative of a huge problem with all officials at the collegiate level. They do not care about the safety of the players. This fool should be looking at the player down on the court to at least make sure he's okay after such a fall. On top of that, he should look there as the dribbler is running near the player down on the court.

College officials are awful.

(sarcasm off)

I was thinking the same thing. A reminder for us to look where the contact is likely to occur.

Anyone else tossing this kid in a high school game?

NFHS: IPF at minimum... I probably wouldn't go flagrant, but I wouldn't try to talk a partner out of a flagrant either.

Duke gets all the calls. :D

Yup. I use almost the same reasoning when I call a flagrant on dunks/layups when the defense comes from behind and takes out the players legs. No excuse for plays that have a high probability of injuring players.

Seeya~

I agree, thanks to all who post videos!

Question about how a slightly different situation would be handled at the NCAA level: White trips black and there is no call (same as before), but the ball bounces to another black player who goes down and scores. At this point, play is stopped to review the trip. How is this play adjudicated?

I'm just going intentional unless there has been other issues with this player/team.

I'm admittedly biased as someone who grew up a UNC fan and then graduated from Maryland but I know College supervisors who still reference the 2001 UMD/Duke Final 4 game as one of the worst officiated games in recent memory. Duke did "get all the calls" in that game. It was rather pathetic actually.

1. You're welcome.

2. The penalty for an F1 is two shots + possession to the offended team. The only difference in your scenario is Louisville would've had 2 (or 3) extra points. Louisville would've received a throw-in at the spot nearest the foul.

Play #1: The defender embellished a bit but I'll go with an illegal screen. Whether the defender was moving as the screen was set was so close I can give the defense the benefit of the doubt.

Play #2: Yeah, kind of baffling why the L/new Twas still looking into the lane when Louisville gained control of the ball. I'd have to think it was the T/new L who initiated talk of a review. If the C had seen it I'm thinking he would've had a late whistle.

Same Duke player is involved in both plays?
Illegal screen is against a player with a history of these.
However, watch #3 in other games - he's also dirty... He's working on his own 30 for 30, "I hate Christian Laettner" story.

1. Play on!
2. Good get... by the monitor.