(Video) Legal or Illegal Screen

[Dad]

Originally Posted by Rich

When I see someone *really* sell a call, I immediately assume they didn't see the play or are trying to convince people of an incorrect call.

Too many years of experience to buy what's being sold, I'm afraid.

Even if they make the call the same way every time?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Dad

Even if they make the call the same way every time?

Then they should tone everything down.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Dad

Even if they make the call the same way every time?

If you make the same call the same way every time, then you aren't really "selling" anything.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

If you make the same call the same way every time, then you aren't really "selling" anything.

Then maybe selling isn't the right word from it. There's a world of difference between lazy mechanics and a strong call that makes people think twice before they start complaining about it.

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by Dad

Then maybe selling isn't the right word from it. There's a world of difference between lazy mechanics and a strong call that makes people think twice before they start complaining about it.

I couldn't agree more.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Dad

Then maybe selling isn't the right word from it. There's a world of difference between lazy mechanics and a strong call that makes people think twice before they start complaining about it.

Yep. And a sharp, yet relaxed (not "selling") call can often sell a call just as well as a sharp, aggressive, call.

[j51969]

Originally Posted by Dad

I'm sorry coaches don't respect you and parents want to beat you up.

Sell your calls better.

Ha

You sir are a tool......

[Dad]

Originally Posted by j51969

Ha

You sir are a tool......

I know.

My apologies, sir.

[AABATTEE]

Hello officials, I'm new to things and after seeing the video 5 times in slow motion I thought the screen was illegal only because the setters left foot was still sliding over while the right foot was planted. I thought this was a bang bang play and only a well trained eye would call it illegal.

[deecee]

Originally Posted by AABATTEE

Hello officials, I'm new to things and after seeing the video 5 times in slow motion I thought the screen was illegal only because the setters left foot was still sliding over while the right foot was planted. I thought this was a bang bang play and only a well trained eye would call it illegal.

Thank god you showed up with your well trained eye.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by AABATTEE

Hello officials, I'm new to things and after seeing the video 5 times in slow motion I thought the screen was illegal only because the setters left foot was still sliding over while the right foot was planted. I thought this was a bang bang play and only a well trained eye would call it illegal.

Actually you have that the other way around.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by AABATTEE

Hello officials, I'm new to things and after seeing the video 5 times in slow motion I thought the screen was illegal only because the setters left foot was still sliding over while the right foot was planted. I thought this was a bang bang play and only a well trained eye would call it illegal.

Unfortunately, that point is irrelevant. There is no part of the screening rule that requires the feet to be planted. Is the body in the path or not in time? That is all you need to know.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by AABATTEE

I'm new to things a...only a well trained eye would call it illegal.

Hmm.