The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 16, 2015, 01:03pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
I haven't read that "8 page pre-season handout" but I'd wager the NFHS means to create an "automatic foul" for contact with the FT shooter in a similar way to how last year two hands, armbars, and hot stove were changed from possibly incidental to now an automatic foul.

Don't see how "automatic foul in these circumstances (contact with FT shooter, two hands, armbar, etc.)" is inconsistent with the NFHS recognizing incidental contact in other areas.
If that's what they want, that would be a major rule/philosophy change, not just some minor editorial update that got overlooked.

You have folks claiming that the NFHS is making it OBVIOUS what it wants. Well, if it so obvious, you would think it would have been something that would have been discussed before the rule book went into to publication. And now we are getting multiple interpretive updates. And these updates are adding absolutes and changing how incidental contact is ruled.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Fri Oct 16, 2015 at 01:18pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 16, 2015, 01:09pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
If that's what they want, that would be a major rule/philosophy change, not just some minor editorial update that got overlooked.

You have folks claiming that the NFHS is making it OBVIOUS what it wants. Well, if it so obvious, you would think it would have been something that would have been discussed before the rule book went into to publication. And now we are getting multiple interpretive updates. And these updates are adding absolutes and changing how incidental contact is to ruled.
So many contradictions, but it is "obvious." Funny how people love to never question the NF when they screw up. They screwed up and they are not correcting it in any way.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Past Interpretations Archive (2025-26 Added) Nevadaref Basketball 45 Yesterday 01:47pm
The NFHS has released a clarification for the 2015 rules interpretations. bigjohn Football 5 Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:49am
2015-16 NFHS Proposed Basketball Rule Changes ... BillyMac Basketball 35 Tue Mar 17, 2015 08:52am
2015 NFHS Rule Changes Andy Softball 14 Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:43am
2006 NFHS Rule Interpretations TxUmp Baseball 0 Tue Feb 07, 2006 09:03am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1