The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   2015/16 NFHS Rule Interpretations (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/100207-2015-16-nfhs-rule-interpretations.html)

Raymond Tue Oct 27, 2015 07:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by grunewar (Post 968588)
SITUATION 2: After A1 releases the ball on a free throw try, B1 steps into the lane and backs across the free-throw line to box out the free-throw shooter then makes contact with the free-throw shooter. The free throw is missed. RULING: The official should rule a delayed violation on the opponent. A1 will be awarded a substitute free throw and the contact is ruled a foul. The substitute free throw would be administered with the free-throw lane spaces unoccupied. (9-1-2g Penalty 2b)[/I]

When I go to the online, 2015-16 NFHS Basketball Rules Book, located at the NFHS Site, 9-1-2 is: Teams shall properly occupy marked lane spaces according to number and space requirements. There is no 2g? There is a 3g though?

Also, the situation says, "The substitute free throw would be administered with the free-throw lane spaces unoccupied."

2.b. says: If the try is not successful, the ball becomes dead when the free throw ends, and a substitute throw shall be attempted by the same free thrower under conditions the same as for the free throw for which it is substituted.

If the conditions are "the same," why is the lane now unoccupied?

Did I miss more changes and corrections or is it just too early in the morning for me to process?
Thanks.

More bad editing?

BryanV21 Tue Oct 27, 2015 07:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 968591)
So your state, or at least your association, is going against the expressed wishes of the NFHS?

Didn't some of us get yelled at for suggesting such actions earlier this summer? :eek:

"I was just doing what (insert guy's name) told me to do."

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

bob jenkins Tue Oct 27, 2015 07:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 968591)
So your state, or at least your association, is going against the expressed wishes of the NFHS?

Didn't some of us get yelled at for suggesting such actions earlier this summer? :eek:

I don't think so.

I think some *individuals* got "yelled at" but it was (mostly, at least) with the understanding that (a) the FED could change the interp and (b) the state could have a different interp


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1