The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Batters Box (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/99715-batters-box.html)

brettbanks Mon Apr 27, 2015 03:30pm

Batters Box
 
Need help. Delayed steal from third to home. When pitcher throws ball catcher to try to get runner at home. The catcher has to reach in batters box where batter is standing to receive ball. The umpire calls the runner out for interference. Batter did not make attempt to hinder catcher from catching ball nor did he make attempt to get out of way. What is the ruling?

Rich Ives Mon Apr 27, 2015 04:16pm

Please describe the sequence better.


When did the "throw" happen?

MD Longhorn Mon Apr 27, 2015 05:00pm

Sounds like INT.

bob jenkins Mon Apr 27, 2015 07:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 961364)
Please describe the sequence better.


When did the "throw" happen?

Further -- was it a throw or a pitch? (Was F1 in contact with the rubber?) If F1 was off, was there a delay between him stepping off and the throw home?

MD Longhorn Tue Apr 28, 2015 09:18am

I'm confused by you guys' confusion.

He said Delayed Steal... not just a normal steal. A delayed steal is when the runner takes off as or slightly after the catcher returns the ball to the pitcher after a pitch.

chapmaja Wed Apr 29, 2015 08:12am

I'm not a baseball ump (except Rec League). I would have to say INT on this play, if the batter hindered the catcher's attempt to catch or tag the runner. If he did not hinder or interfere with the catcher, it can't be interference because he never interfered. If the catcher could not catch the ball, it would be interference if the act was intentional or not. Why? At the point the delayed steal occurred the batter had time to get himself out of the way of the incoming runner (assuming a RH batter) and the throw from the pitcher to the catcher.

Had this been a steal on a pitch, rather than a delayed steal I would say no INT, but on a delayed steal, the batter has to get out of the way of the play.

Also, I could be wrong, but in this case wouldn't the batter (who interfered) be out for interference, rather than the runner, since it was the batter who interfered?

Rich Ives Wed Apr 29, 2015 09:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 961386)
I'm confused by you guys' confusion.

He said Delayed Steal... not just a normal steal. A delayed steal is when the runner takes off as or slightly after the catcher returns the ball to the pitcher after a pitch.

That's one way.

MD Longhorn Wed Apr 29, 2015 09:15am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 961480)
That's one way.

:) ... ok...

Thanks for utterly failing to alleviate my confusion. :)

ozzy6900 Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:55am

Okay, would the original poster please inform all of us, did F1 PITCH or THROW the ball to the plate? None of us were there and several people have asked for clarification!!

brettbanks Wed Apr 29, 2015 11:23am

Was not a pitch it was a throw. Delayed steal

bob jenkins Wed Apr 29, 2015 12:45pm

Then probably INT.

CT1 Thu Apr 30, 2015 09:21am

INT, assuming B1 had time to vacate the area.

Mrumpiresir Thu Apr 30, 2015 07:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by chapmaja (Post 961477)
Also, I could be wrong, but in this case wouldn't the batter (who interfered) be out for interference, rather than the runner, since it was the batter who interfered?

With less than two outs, the runner is out. If there are two outs, the batter is out.

PAlbc Fri May 08, 2015 10:49am

Ok, different scenario, but what would this count as?

https://vine.co/v/e7QLrnjB6jQ

bob jenkins Sat May 09, 2015 06:10am

It would count as a bush play by a MiLB player, and a pitch in the ribs the next time up.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1