I Missed This Question ....
I missed the following question on a test:
With a runner on third (R3) a batter hits a ball that drifts over foul territory. The third baseman is accidentally prevented by the runner R3 from catching the ball. What's the call? Answer was that the batter is out. I'm struggling to wrap my brain around that answer. Does the "accidental" aspect play into the ruling at all? Does fair/foul have an impact on who is out? Tell me what questions I'm not asking myself. |
What rules? Who prevented him?
|
Quote:
|
Where was the out possible?
|
Quote:
Are you reading the question (Fed Test) correctly? There are two different questions on the test, one right after the other with almost the exact same wording. One has the 3rd base coach "accidentally" interfering with a foul fly ball catch; the other has the runner at 3rd "accidentally" interfering with a foul fly catch. Both of them are "outs," though two different players are declared out. Read Rule 7-4-1(f), then Casebook plays 7.4.1(H) and 8.4.2(B) |
Quote:
28) With a runner on third, the batter hits a high pop fly that drifts over foul territory. The third baseman is accidentally prevented from catching the ball by the runner at third base. 1. Foul ball. YOUR ANSWER 2. The runner at third is out. 3. The batter is out. 4. The coach is restricted to the bench and the coaching box must remain unoccupied. Reference: 8-4-2g I copied the question and the answer I got back. I see why my answer was wrong. I just can't figure out why the batter is out. You can't see it from what I copied but they have a mark next to both my answer and the correct answer. They have 3 as the correct answer. |
Quote:
However, 8.4.2 Sit B in the current casebook has the exact same play and it has the runner on third being declared out. |
Quote:
I think I have heard that this question has been acknowledged by FED (or some state(s) ) to be incorrect. |
Quote:
I don't remember, but does it matter how many outs are remaining? I feel like I remember reading at some point that w/ two outs we get the batter, w/ < 2 out we get the runner. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
R3 (the player who interfered) is out. Don't forget to add a strike to the count if there were less than 2 strikes already.
|
If the ball was fair, I think the batter would get 1st.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
JJ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Rule 5-1-1e
Ball becomes dead immediately when there is interference by a runner, batter-runner, or a retired runner, the batter , or any person. Rule 8-4-2g .....If , in the judgment of the umpire, the runner including the batter runner interferes in any way and prevents a double play anywhere, two shall be declared out... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For instance if a runner was on 1st and was running on the pitch. If the umpire feels he would have been a dead duck on the appeal play, based on Rule 8-4-2g he could call him out as well. All I am saying is that just because the ball is immediately dead and the runner is out, there are other things to consider on this play. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
In NCAA and MLB, if that interference is INTENTIONAL, both the runner AND the batter are declared out. Sort of what the FED rule says "if the interference prevents a double play"...but the majority of the time only the runner is out, and if it's a foul ball a strike is added to the count (if the batter has less than two strikes).
JJ |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13am. |