The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Two Pitching Changes Spark Protest (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/94982-two-pitching-changes-spark-protest.html)

jwwashburn Fri May 10, 2013 05:33pm

Do you have THIS on the ipod?

Mr. Trololo original upload - YouTube

UMP25 Fri May 10, 2013 05:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant (Post 893620)
Not quite, Culbreth gets two games and other 3 are fined. Umpiring crew disciplined for rule mishap | MLB.com: News

My original post was obtained from what David Shuster of 670 WSCR Radio had said during one of his news breaks this afternoon. He led off the news with this comment: "Major League Baseball has suspended Umpire Crew Chief Fieldin Culbreth and his crew for 2 games for...". Thanks for pointing out that that wasn't completely accurate.

Steven Tyler Fri May 10, 2013 05:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmagan (Post 893581)
Every time Dwight Howard does something stupid, he faces the media. Fieldin Culbreth is a fifty year old man and runs away when someone challenges him. Fieldin has to grow up and learn how to deal with tough questions. People half his age in sports learn how to deal with tough questions. Angel Hernandez is probably a lost cause, but Culbreth damaged his reputation this week.

Fielden Culbreth has been suspended for two games. Pretty simple rule. Should have known the rule at that level.

jicecone Fri May 10, 2013 06:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 893615)
If the guy is not in the game until he throws a pitch then how does it make sense to require him to throw a pitch before he can be replaced? How can he be "replaced" if he is not in the game?

You are totally correct and I was smoking something this morning. Sometimes it pays to put the brain in gear before opening the mouth.

LilLeaguer Fri May 10, 2013 06:36pm

Joe Maddon got away with almost this
 
I wonder if the umpires were remembering this 2011 play, which resulted in 3.05(d).

David B Fri May 10, 2013 07:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP25 (Post 893616)
The crew in Houston last night didn't get away with it. MLB has suspended Fieldin Culbreth and his crew for 2 games for their misapplication of the rule.

Personally, I have no problem with such penalty. Making an error in a judgment call is one thing, but to me, not getting a ruling correct is inexcusable. Period.

well and we're not talking about just one umpire here - they should all be suspended - the whole crew. That rule has been the same forever and is that way at all levels if i recall correctly.

Thanks
DAvid

Matt Fri May 10, 2013 09:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmagan (Post 893601)
You can get away with that in the mid-1980's, not in today's world. By not speaking to the press, does Fieldin thinks it would go away? It just makes it worse, with people thinking cover up, or he didn't know the rule. If Fieldin knew the rule, he should have told the pool reporter after the game. He didn't and you know and I know what that means.

I know what that means...that he was following MLB's directive that no umpire talks to the media about a protested call.

You, OTOH...

Manny A Sun May 12, 2013 06:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LilLeaguer (Post 893633)
I wonder if the umpires were remembering this 2011 play, which resulted in 3.05(d).

Interesting. I had no idea this rule existed. If this had happened to me in a game, I wouldn't think twice, since the pitcher had already met his obligation by pitching in the previous inning(s).

That said, I doubt 3.05(d) has filtered down to lower levels.

ozzy6900 Sun May 12, 2013 06:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylejt (Post 893623)
One of the umpires made a phone call from the dugout. Hopefully, that guy gets the worst of it....

In MLB, once a manager says he wants to protest, the umpires have to meet and make sure that they are correct in their rule interpretation/application (in this case, they were way off), then the CC has to contact official scorekeeper and explain the situation (thus the phone call) to log the protest. Doing that, the CC comes onto the field, faces the press boxes and makes the "P" sign to declare the game is under protest.

If this were a playoff or world series game, that phone call would have been to the MLB representative for verification, then the official scorekeeper would be notified.

bob jenkins Sun May 12, 2013 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 893711)
Interesting. I had no idea this rule existed. If this had happened to me in a game, I wouldn't think twice, since the pitcher had already met his obligation by pitching in the previous inning(s).

That said, I doubt 3.05(d) has filtered down to lower levels.

It should have filtered down to every league who uses "OBR, except ..." rules.

It's also an NCAA rule -- I had to enforce it last weekend, and it almost came up in a conference tournament game this weekend. Turns out the (new) defensive coach had made a "projected" substitution, so th eoriginal starter was already out of the game when he crossed the foul line.

tmagan Sun May 12, 2013 02:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt (Post 893640)
I know what that means...that he was following MLB's directive that no umpire talks to the media about a protested call.

You, OTOH...

He can recite the rule in question to the pool reporter, the mechanics with regard to the incident in question, he can leave that to the report. Frankly, I could care less if he didn't know the rule. An umpire once in his career is entitled to forget a rule or a ball-strike count, it happens. When you try to hide from it right after the game, you turn a bad situation and make it worse.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1