|
Mon Mar 04, 2013, 02:59pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is not my intent to hijack the thread away from should or should there have been an ejection, but rather let us focus on the timing of the Timeout request.
F1 had just come to his Set Position (SeP) when B2 requested a TO and then the PU granted B2's request. I have no problem with granting B2's TO request while F1 is in the Stretch Position (StP) but I have qualms about granting it once F1 is in his set SeP. While being in the SeP is not that same as F1 starting his pitching motion. Once in the SeP F1 can pitch or start any number of defensive plays on Runners that are on base. This is not to say that the defense cannot start a defensive play when F1 is in the StP, but I just believe the SeP is an altogether different animal when it comes to granting the offense's TO request. What say you? MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interesting Play | BK47 | Baseball | 14 | Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:15pm |
| Interesting play............ | Cajun Reff | Softball | 22 | Sat May 31, 2008 01:09am |
| Interesting Play | David B | Baseball | 23 | Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:48am |
| Interesting Play | tzme415 | Softball | 5 | Fri May 05, 2006 04:00pm |
| Interesting Play | heyblue | Softball | 9 | Mon Oct 25, 2004 09:54pm |
Threaded Mode
