The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Why is the ruling on this move being changed? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/92245-why-ruling-move-being-changed.html)

Achu Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:43am

Why is the ruling on this move being changed?
 
BlackBerry: Bold Plays | STL@PHI: Papelbon picks off Beltran to earn the save - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

Hey everybody. Just wondering if there has been an official statement regarding why this move is becoming a balk next year in OBR. (RHP, step to third, look to or throw to first)

Is it a speed-of-game issue? I have never umpired at a level where this is common or even allowed, so, I'm not quite sure what the rationale would be. In my opinion it can be an effective psychological tool (or clue). Sorry if this has been widely discussed as I'm sure all rule changes are, but I couldn't find anything while searching.

Rita C Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Achu (Post 852006)
BlackBerry: Bold Plays | STL@PHI: Papelbon picks off Beltran to earn the save - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

Hey everybody. Just wondering if there has been an official statement regarding why this move is becoming a balk next year in OBR. (RHP, step to third, look to or throw to first)

Is it a speed-of-game issue? I have never umpired at a level where this is common or even allowed, so, I'm not quite sure what the rationale would be. In my opinion it can be an effective psychological tool (or clue). Sorry if this has been widely discussed as I'm sure all rule changes are, but I couldn't find anything while searching.

I know announcers have been complaining that this should be a balk for years, because it "deceives" the runners.

Which is why it always works, right?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Rita

jicecone Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:29am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Achu (Post 852006)
BlackBerry: Bold Plays | STL@PHI: Papelbon picks off Beltran to earn the save - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

Hey everybody. Just wondering if there has been an official statement regarding why this move is becoming a balk next year in OBR. (RHP, step to third, look to or throw to first)

Is it a speed-of-game issue? I have never umpired at a level where this is common or even allowed, so, I'm not quite sure what the rationale would be. In my opinion it can be an effective psychological tool (or clue). Sorry if this has been widely discussed as I'm sure all rule changes are, but I couldn't find anything while searching.

First of all, everything I have read has used the word "maybe", so that doesn't mean it definetly is.

Now , What the heck are you talking about? I have to question what level you have umpired at because, this is a common as "Ball or Strike" at all games above LL level.

"it can be an effective psychological tool"

What does that mean? This is Baseball were discussing.

Here is a quote about this move that shows the type of brillance we are dealing with here.

"I think they should get rid of it," Yankees reliever Boone Logan said. "Us lefties can't do that. If we do, they call a balk."

About the only reason I can think of, of why they want to eliminate this is, it shows up the intelligence of some of ther players. The clip already proves that it still works in the game. I don't see why they want to eliminate it but, it's their League.

tcarilli Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 852009)
..."I think they should get rid of it," Yankees reliever Boone Logan said. "Us lefties can't do that. If we do, they call a balk."

Unless I am missing something, a left-handed pitcher can step toward third fake a throw there, disengage the rubber, and throw to first. Now it would look silly and I have never seen it. But there is no rule precluding a lefty from doing a third-to-first move.

MD Longhorn Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tcarilli (Post 852017)
Unless I am missing something, a left-handed pitcher can step toward third fake a throw there, disengage the rubber, and throw to first. Now it would look silly and I have never seen it. But there is no rule precluding a lefty from doing a third-to-first move.

Yeah, he left that part out... what he really meant was...

"We lefties can't do that very well and look foolish when we try".

Achu Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 852009)
Now , What the heck are you talking about? I have to question what level you have umpired at because, this is a common as "Ball or Strike" at all games above LL level.

"it can be an effective psychological tool"

What does that mean? This is Baseball were discussing.

Question away. I volunteer as a Little League umpire in a small Maine town where many parents can't even afford gloves for their kids. I don't get paid and I'm at this forum because I'm trying to learn how to be as good as I can. I was just curious about the rule change.

As is the case with lazy pickoff throws and any check on a runner, it is a way of letting the runner know the pitcher is paying attention. That's all I meant. Thanks for the reply.

mbyron Fri Aug 17, 2012 01:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Achu (Post 852006)
Hey everybody. Just wondering if there has been an official statement regarding why this move is becoming a balk next year in OBR. (RHP, step to third, look to or throw to first)

Is it a speed-of-game issue?

1. No official statement AFAIK.

2. No, I believe that it's an attempt to rebalance the rules to favor runners a tiny bit. This happens every so often with OBR.

FWIW, it seemed to me that Papelbon balked in the video you posted, and not in the way you're asking about.

Manny A Fri Aug 17, 2012 01:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 852018)
Yeah, he left that part out... what he really meant was...

"We lefties can't do that very well and look foolish when we try".

Actually, I think he was complaining that lefties aren't allowed to do the fake-to-first-throw-to-third move, essentially mirroring the righty move.

tcarilli Fri Aug 17, 2012 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 852028)
Actually, I think he was complaining that lefties aren't allowed to do the fake-to-first-throw-to-third move, essentially mirroring the righty move.

Ya think? :eek:

MD Longhorn Fri Aug 17, 2012 01:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Achu (Post 852019)
Question away. I volunteer as a Little League umpire in a small Maine town where many parents can't even afford gloves for their kids. I don't get paid and I'm at this forum because I'm trying to learn how to be as good as I can. I was just curious about the rule change.

As is the case with lazy pickoff throws and any check on a runner, it is a way of letting the runner know the pitcher is paying attention. That's all I meant. Thanks for the reply.

The goal of the pitcher is to catch the runner taking some extra lead when he initially thinks the ball is going to third, and then fire back to catch him too far off or leaning. It VERY rarely works, and often gets boo'ed at MLB parks.

jicecone Fri Aug 17, 2012 02:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 852028)
Actually, I think he was complaining that lefties aren't allowed to do the fake-to-first-throw-to-third move, essentially mirroring the righty move.

And neither are rightys.

BigUmp56 Fri Aug 17, 2012 08:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 852027)
1. No official statement AFAIK.

2. No, I believe that it's an attempt to rebalance the rules to favor runners a tiny bit. This happens every so often with OBR.

FWIW, it seemed to me that Papelbon balked in the video you posted, and not in the way you're asking about.

I had a balk on the play as well. Possibly for two reasons.

One - Looked like the free foot crossed the back plane of the rubber. (maybe)

Two - Also looked like he may have started to rotate toward home rather than step directly toward third. (or more to home than third).

Tim.

tcarilli Sat Aug 18, 2012 06:06am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56 (Post 852047)
I had a balk on the play as well. Possibly for two reasons.

One - Looked like the free foot crossed the back plane of the rubber. (maybe)

Two - Also looked like he may have started to rotate toward home rather than step directly toward third. (or more to home than third).

Tim.

No way on either.

1. whole foot has to cross whole rubber, not even close. (see below and thanks to mbyron for updating me on this one). I still don't see him breaking the back edge here.

2. everything went towards third.

No way this is a balk.

mbyron Sat Aug 18, 2012 07:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tcarilli (Post 852061)
1. whole foot has to cross whole rubber, not even close.

Tony, that's the FED rule (6-2-4f).

OBR 8.05a COMMENT is usually interpreted as any part of the foot.

tcarilli Sat Aug 18, 2012 09:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 852065)
Tony, that's the FED rule (6-2-4f).

OBR 8.05a COMMENT is usually interpreted as any part of the foot.

I don't think that is what 8.05a says. Maybe I'm getting old and fuzzy headed but I remember as a cadet at the Academy being told that it was the whole foot past the whole rubber.

I stand corrected I just found MLBUM 7.5(c).

NCAA is explicit about it in 9-1-b (3)
Quote:

When the pitcher starts the delivery from the set position and the entire free foot or any part of the stride leg breaks the plane of theback edge of the pitcher’s rubber, the pitcher is committed to throwor feint a motion toward second base or pitch to home plate.
Thanks for making me look it up, I appreciate it really. Any day I can learn something is a good day! :)

And I really got to update my PBUC manual. The one I have says in 6.4 (b)
Quote:

...when he swings his entire foot completely behind the back edge of the rubber.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1