The Official Forum
Page 10 of 10 « First 89 10
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Running Lane - Whose Call? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/92187-running-lane-whose-call.html)

JRutledge Mon Aug 13, 2012 01:22pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 851677)
I thought he was pretty clear. Obviously at least 2 vociferous individuals here disagree with Jim Evans. They must have more experience than him.
I guess this was not very clear.

BTW, first post of the entire thread in response to the OP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 850936)
Unless the philosophy has changed, I believe either one can call this. The HP umpire might have other things going on based on many other plays, so I think either one is responsible to call this if necessary. I know that has been the philosophy at other levels.
Peace

CT1 Mon Aug 13, 2012 01:32pm
What would have been clean, simple and clear is:

"The plate umpire has primary responsibility for running lane interference."

mbyron Mon Aug 13, 2012 01:42pm
What a shame that this thread was simply miscommunication. I'm really going to miss it.

tcarilli Mon Aug 13, 2012 02:01pm
For you Ren and Stimpy fans in the crowd:

Must...resist...the...shiny...red...button!

Ren & Stimpy: Space Madness

Manny A Mon Aug 13, 2012 02:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 851702)
I'm really going to miss it.
Miss what? Did something just happen?

http://www.getyourfilmfix.com/wp-con...ind-eraser.jpg

JRutledge Mon Aug 13, 2012 02:08pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 (Post 851699)
What would have been clean, simple and clear is:

"The plate umpire has primary responsibility for running lane interference."
Why would that have been any clearer? It is obvious that to some "primary" means "only" in this conversation. In every other sports officiating discussion it is understood that if someone has a "primary" someone else has a "secondary." And you do not get people normally saying that one person should "always" have a call and the other should just die if they even think to make a call that would be "correct."

I do not understand why I had to be so clear, when it was obvious I disagreed with a specific point. If I said what I believed you would have accepted that anyway? I doubt that seriously.

Peace

CT1 Thu Aug 16, 2012 05:41pm
Ydgtlw.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51am.
Page 10 of 10 « First 89 10
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1