![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A glove isn't a mitt. Anyone claiming they don't know the difference is yanking your chain. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1B may wear a glove or mitt in lieu of going barehanded. Other fielders may wear a glove in lieu of going barehanded. The "may" in the hand-covering rules is there to allow them to wear the device in the first place. The game was originally played bare-handed and so there had to be a rule to allow hand-coverings after the traditionalists objected. The different rules specify which type of device is allowed at which position. The catcher may wear a mitt. If the rules wanted to allow a mitt or glove they would say so, as they do for F3. I'm headed to the ballpark now - prep for opening day. |
Bunch of friggin pansies using gloves and mitts! Play barehanded like the Good Lord intended!:D
|
I don't see how you could say a catcher can't wear a glove when the rule says
1.12 The catcher may wear a mitt. To me that does not prevent them from wearing a glove. It certainly makes no sense that you would let them go bare-handed, but not wear a glove. Besides MLB UMP 2.11 says may not substitute a fielder's glove or first baseman's mitt during progress of a game implies that he can wear a glove as long as it is not substituted. We often have kids in Pony wear a glove - usually occurring when a catcher is lefty and has no catcher's glove. Pat |
Earliest rule stated glove or mitt?
"As the evolution of the glove progressed, the National League and American Association of Base Ball Clubs instituted a rule in 1895 which stated, "The catcher and the first baseman are permitted to wear a glove or mitt of any size, shape or weight. All other players are restricted to the use of a glove or mitt weighing not over ten ounces, and measuring in circumference around the palm of the hand not over fourteen inches." This would be the rule for the rest of the 19th century. Also in 1895, Cincinnati Reds second baseman Bid McPhee, the last of the bare-handed players, opened the season on April 16, wearing a glove."
A catchers mitt will outlast, outprotect and outperform a fielders glove over the course of a game and a season. That said, catching w/out a mitt is like bowling with an 8 or 10 ounce bowling ball, playing tennis with an old wood racquet, and going fishing with a cane pole. An average adult would probably choose the latest available standards of modern sporting equipment. Get that fielder's glove outta there. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37pm. |