The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   WTF Was McCarver Talking About (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/69189-wtf-mccarver-talking-about.html)

Spence Sat May 07, 2011 03:14pm

WTF Was McCarver Talking About
 
R1. Long flyball to CF. CF runs after it, reaches for it, misses it. Ball bounces into the stands for a groundrule double. R1 returns to 3rd.

McCarver kept saying the Reds were lucky that the CF did not "touch the ball" before it went into the stands.

I am not an umpire but I do try to stay up on the rules. Is there some rule I'm missing that would have allowed R1 to score had it been determined that the CF touched the ball?

UmpJM Sat May 07, 2011 03:16pm

Spence,

No.

JM

MikeStrybel Sat May 07, 2011 03:54pm

Tim McCarver may have been an excellent athlete but he has a legacy of commentary misspeak. I will have to dig a bit but I once received an email with a link to McCarver and Joe Morgan blunders. It was pretty entertaining for those of us who understand the rules and terminology.

biggravy Sat May 07, 2011 06:37pm

Great ball player, now a total effing idiot. When he does commentary I watch games on mute.

Stu Clary Sat May 07, 2011 07:00pm

WTF is McCarver EVER talking about? Also: NOT a great ballplayer...but he turned being Steve Carlton's personal catcher into a lucrative career.

Blue37 Sat May 07, 2011 10:23pm

Perhaps he meant it was good that the ball did not deflect into the stands off of the player. Only thing I can figure.

ODJ Sat May 07, 2011 10:51pm

CSN SportsNet wrap up had same comment. Stupid after stupid.

yawetag Sat May 07, 2011 11:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue37 (Post 756873)
Perhaps he meant it was good that the ball did not deflect into the stands off of the player. Only thing I can figure.

That's the only possibility. Deflected and over the fence without touching ground.

APG Sun May 08, 2011 12:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by yawetag (Post 756877)
That's the only possibility. Deflected and over the fence without touching ground.

Most likely, especially since we've seen it happen this year. A very poorly phrased sentence from him...but then again he is McCarver and an announcer so not a shock. It's the same or worse on other sports.

mbyron Sun May 08, 2011 06:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue37 (Post 756873)
Perhaps he meant it was good that the ball did not deflect into the stands off of the player. Only thing I can figure.

He can't have meant that, as he described the defense as "lucky" that F8 didn't touch the ball.

yawetag Sun May 08, 2011 08:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 756914)
He can't have meant that, as he described the defense as "lucky" that F8 didn't touch the ball.

What we meant is "Tim was confusing another rule with what actually happened. Tim was thinking in his head of the rule we mentioned, but including it in a situation where the ball actually bounces inside the park first."

In other words, Tim doesn't know anything about the finer rules of baseball and was trying to sound smart.

MikeStrybel Sun May 08, 2011 08:43am

The link with Morgan's and McCarver's blunders is no longer viable. I found this: The I Hate Tim McCarver Home Page

and

”The McCarver Drinking Game
Here’s how to play:
Get a bottle of your favorite booze and a shot glass and…
1: Drink every time Tim uses a multi-syllable word incorrectly.
2: Drink every time Tim states the obvious like it is a profound insight.
3: Drink every time Tim calls the play wrong.
4: Drink every time Tim gets a player’s name wrong.
5: Drink every time one of Tim’s inane comments is met with stoney silence by the other broadcasters in the booth.
My guarantee is you’ll be drunk by the bottom of the 1st inning!"

mbyron Sun May 08, 2011 06:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by yawetag (Post 756936)
In other words, Tim doesn't know anything about the finer rules of baseball and was trying to sound smart.

And with that, I have no dispute whatever. :)

greymule Mon May 09, 2011 09:38am

You guys are too hard on McCarver. He meant simply that by not touching the ball, the outfielder (and the Reds) avoided being charged with an error.

mbyron Mon May 09, 2011 09:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule (Post 757199)
You guys are too hard on McCarver. He meant simply that by not touching the ball, the outfielder (and the Reds) avoided being charged with an error.

Maybe we are hard on him, but that's wrong, too. :rolleyes:

seenitall Mon May 09, 2011 10:35am

Too hard on McCarver? Not possible.

MD Longhorn Mon May 09, 2011 10:37am

Congratulations. You were the 100th person to start a thread with that exact title. You've won a year's supply of Rice-A-Roni, the San Francisco Treat.

Suudy Mon May 09, 2011 10:39am

Not being up on the world of baseball commentators (I only watch Mariner's baseball and our local color guys), it sounds like McCarver is to baseball what Theisman is to football. :p

jophyal Mon May 09, 2011 10:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suudy (Post 757227)
Not being up on the world of baseball commentators (I only watch Mariner's baseball and our local color guys), it sounds like McCarver is to baseball what Theisman is to football. :p

Theisman does the Mariners baseball games...who knew?

mbyron Mon May 09, 2011 11:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jophyal (Post 757233)
Theisman does the Mariners baseball games...who knew?

You struggled with analogies on the SAT, right? :rolleyes:

yawetag Mon May 09, 2011 01:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 757264)
You struggled with analogies on the SAT, right? :rolleyes:

Like a cheetah struggles with running.

greymule Mon May 09, 2011 06:36pm

You guys are too hard on McCarver. He meant simply that by not touching the ball, the outfielder (and the Reds) avoided being charged with an error.

Maybe we are hard on him, but that's wrong, too.

What do you mean wrong? If the ball doesn't hit the glove, it can't be an error. Conversely, if it does hit the glove, it is an error. It's right on the same page where it says you have to hold the ball for three seconds for it to be a legal catch.

SanDiegoSteve Mon May 09, 2011 07:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule (Post 757385)
You guys are too hard on McCarver. He meant simply that by not touching the ball, the outfielder (and the Reds) avoided being charged with an error.

Maybe we are hard on him, but that's wrong, too.

What do you mean wrong? If the ball doesn't hit the glove, it can't be an error. Conversely, if it does hit the glove, it is an error. It's right on the same page where it says you have to hold the ball for three seconds for it to be a legal catch.

Walt, that is what I love about your wit!:cool:

UMP 64 Tue May 10, 2011 10:52am

McCarver
 
:eek: He is an idiot, has-been that never was. He is a lifetime .250 avg. certainly nothing to brag about, and so true about being Charlton's jock strap catcher.
Where is Dion Sanders when we need him, to dump another bucket of ice water on McC:confused: and wake him up?????

GA Umpire Tue May 10, 2011 12:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP 64 (Post 757584)
:eek: He is an idiot, has-been that never was. He is a lifetime .250 avg. certainly nothing to brag about, and so true about being Charlton's jock strap catcher.
Where is Dion Sanders when we need him, to dump another bucket of ice water on McC:confused: and wake him up?????

While this may be true, he has the luxury many of us want. He got paid to play a game and he gets to watch games for a living. The one luxury (spoiler I guess) is to look like an idiot on national TV and doesn't know any better to realize how stupid he sounds. If all I had to do was try to avoid sounding stupid on TV but not accomplishing it very well, I'll take that job. Maybe I won't be as bad.

jophyal Tue May 10, 2011 12:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 757264)
You struggled with analogies on the SAT, right? :rolleyes:

you got me... i messed that one up like a football bat.

MD Longhorn Tue May 10, 2011 12:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jophyal (Post 757619)
you got me... i messed that one up like a football bat.

simile. Not analogy. :)

SanDiegoSteve Tue May 10, 2011 01:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP 64 (Post 757584)
:eek: He is an idiot, has-been that never was. He is a lifetime .250 avg. certainly nothing to brag about, and so true about being Charlton's jock strap catcher.

I really don't think you mean Norm Charlton, do you? Did you mean Steve Carlton, by chance?:confused:

MD Longhorn Tue May 10, 2011 02:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 757634)
I really don't think you mean Norm Charlton, do you? Did you mean Steve Carlton, by chance?:confused:

No ... Charlton Fisk. :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1