The Official Forum
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   BOO & Continuous Action (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/66868-boo-continuous-action.html)

UmpJM Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:48pm
Chris,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Viverito (Post 752960)
"Rescinded"? Are you suggesting that Roder pulled the case because it was wrong?
That is certainly one possibility. I just said that it wasn't there anymore. I actually have no idea why.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Viverito (Post 752970)
True - the source is unimpeachable. You read the e-mail from the source. I think it is safe to say that the NCAA wants us to allow such advances. To suggest or instruct otherwise is an intentional contradiction to what the NCAA wants us to rule. In other words - an umpire who rules against what the organization wants will likely lose in an official protest.
I do not think it is safe to say that because there is nothing in the text of the rule or any interpretation that suggests the source's suggested ruling is correct.

JM

UmpTTS43 Sun Apr 24, 2011 02:03pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Viverito (Post 752960)
"Rescinded"? Are you suggesting that Roder pulled the case because it was wrong?
Wouldn't be the first time. Won't be the last.

greymule Sun Apr 24, 2011 02:31pm
I'm going to settle this once and for all by ordering the "get every MLB game" option from my cable TV company and then simply watching all the games until the play occurs and I can see how the umpires rule.

bob jenkins Sun Apr 24, 2011 05:32pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule (Post 753018)
I'm going to settle this once and for all by ordering the "get every MLB game" option from my cable TV company and then simply watching all the games until the play occurs and I can see how the umpires rule.
Good idea. But, that assumes that they would rule correctly.

To be sure, however they rule should be protested, and then the protest ruled upon.

UmpTTS43 Sun Apr 24, 2011 06:30pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Viverito (Post 752970)
True - the source is unimpeachable. You read the e-mail from the source. I think it is safe to say that the NCAA wants us to allow such advances. To suggest or instruct otherwise is an intentional contradiction to what the NCAA wants us to rule. In other words - an umpire who rules against what the organization wants will likely lose in an official protest.
Haven't gotten that memo yet.

Chris Viverito Mon Apr 25, 2011 08:27am
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 (Post 753043)
Haven't gotten that memo yet.
There isn't one published. But if you are interested in what they want...all you have to do is ask for it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12am.
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1