The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 04, 2011, 03:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
2011 CCA Manual, Impressions?

I assume some of you have already gotten your hands on the new CCA manual, mine came today. What is your opinion of the implementation of the 20 second rule?

IMO, it sounds like a mess to me, esp. if you have no visible clock and a 2 man crew.

I am also curious, the NCAA folks are making this into a huge deal, but in the past several years I've never had any games with massive delays or 40 run games or problem with slow pitches and hitters. Is it so bad in other places that this is as big a priority item as it seems? Or is this just a big deal because of ESPN's coverage of the D1 CWS taking too long?

With the new bats I would think games will be shorter, not longer in the future. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 04, 2011, 03:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkumpire View Post
IMO, it sounds like a mess to me, esp. if you have no visible clock and a 2 man crew.
The only thing worse than no visible clock would be a visible clock. How many "countdowns" would you hear?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 04, 2011, 03:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
Efforts to speed up play have constantly been a point of emphasis for the college game. My impression of why the NCAA is spending so much time on the 20 sec rule is twofold. 1) To get all officials on the same page and 2) To let coaches know that pace of play will be a top priority. I do agree that with the new bats, game times should drop. 3 1/2-4 hour games are inexcusible. Even with all the ingame promotions, indy pro games average under 3 hours. Gotta love the wood bat.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 09:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The worlds of H.S., JUCCO, D3 - D1 baseball.
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
The only thing worse than no visible clock would be a visible clock. How many "countdowns" would you hear?
Why would hearing countdowns be a problem?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 10:11am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
I was ahead of my time. A few years ago, I started taking a stopwatch out as the between innings time was getting out of hand. I started telling both coaches that the pitchers needed to get out quicker, because once we hit the time, I'd call out "one more pitch" and off we'd go. After one pitcher got 2 warmups, they figured out I was serious. Our games were going 3.5+ hours and I was sick of it. Naturally, after a few of these dates, I get an email from the assignor telling me to knock it off.

That was my last season of college baseball -- I quit at the end of the year. Working a 6+ hour DH for $185 more than 2 hours from home for coaches that thought they were the second coming of Earl Weaver lost its luster for me.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 09:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
With U1 at first with 2 outs this puts U1 in the best position for the 3rd out playing the percentages. This falls in line with pro mechanics. U1 will have plays at first and BR into second. This is simply a reverse rotation, or slide. It really isnt that difficult. It is merely putting the umpires in the best positions for the most likely plays. Mechanics evolve. Evolve with them.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 06, 2011, 01:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 View Post
With U1 at first with 2 outs this puts U1 in the best position for the 3rd out playing the percentages. This falls in line with pro mechanics. U1 will have plays at first and BR into second. This is simply a reverse rotation, or slide. It really isnt that difficult. It is merely putting the umpires in the best positions for the most likely plays. Mechanics evolve. Evolve with them.
That is not what the CCA manual says. It is telling us that U1 will have all plays at first and U3 has everything at second and third base. They don't want us to rotate at all. Check out page 168 in the new manual.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 04, 2011, 05:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Well,

JK,

You don't umpire in the PAC 10.

Four hour nine inning games are normal.

There is a "pace of play issue" in the West.

T
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 01:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
This is off the topic of clocks, but....

They switched it now in the 3-umpire system so that U1 is on the line with R2 or R2/R3 and two outs. They also said that on a base hit, U1 only has plays at first and U3 takes all plays at second and third. We were taught at a clinic this fall that U1 would take the BR into second if he advanced there and U3 would have all plays at third.

What do you guys think of this?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
This is off the topic of clocks, but....

They switched it now in the 3-umpire system so that U1 is on the line with R2 or R2/R3 and two outs. They also said that on a base hit, U1 only has plays at first and U3 takes all plays at second and third. We were taught at a clinic this fall that U1 would take the BR into second if he advanced there and U3 would have all plays at third.

What do you guys think of this?
I don't get a vote, so I'll work as I'm asked to work.

If I was given a vote, I would have voted against this change.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 05, 2011, 08:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I don't get a vote, so I'll work as I'm asked to work.

If I was given a vote, I would have voted against this change.
You don't like putting U1 back on the line with two outs, or you don't like the mechanic on a base hit?

I really like putting U1 back on the line FWIW.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2011 NFHS changes Rich Baseball 17 Tue Aug 24, 2010 03:54am
Summer camp good impressions Amesman Basketball 14 Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:49pm
Making Good Impressions dweigs Basketball 17 Mon Feb 25, 2008 05:01pm
Piston's Playoffs Game - Impressions rotationslim Basketball 5 Sat Apr 29, 2006 04:36pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1