![]() |
runner stops going to first.....
didnt see the play....wandered in afterwards...but 3 people jumped me and asked me about it.
runner on first....sac bunt to the first baseman, fields the ball, runner is coming towards him, stops to avoid tag. Runner on first rounds second, so first basemen does not apply tag. throws to second. First base umpire calls batter/runner out. But batter/runner continues to first since he was not tagged....umpires get together and home plate umpire calls batter runner safe since he was not tagged....all hell breaks loose... Didnt the batter/runner give himself up and is therefore out? |
No, the runner did not give himself up...was he out of the baseline heading for the dugout? If not, he has the right to stop....the homeplate ump got the call right.
|
Quote:
The BR may have ATTEMPTED to "give himself up", but he was unsuccessful. As described, the BR was NOT out. JM |
didnt see the play myself. Different stories as to what exactly happend. What if the BR starts back towards home?
|
Quote:
|
He can go all the way back until he would touch or pass homeplate.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's fine until he reaches the plate. Once he reaches the plate, he's out. From the MLBUM: Quote:
JM |
thanks guys....i will pass it on to the rabid fans.
|
Quote:
But now you know, go get 'em. |
First time I've heard fans wanting to apply a softball rule to baseball... usually it's the other way around.
|
Yes, ASA softball, BR out if he steps backward to avoid or delay a tag. I think Fed is the same. Note that the violation is treated as interference. And it applies only to the BR, not a runner forced from any base.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
After thinking about it on and off for weeks I still think WTF. |
Quote:
|
I agree - that rule is not consistent with other rules in ASA. I can understand why they want to call BR out (I don't agree... but I understand) - but it should merely be an out for running out of the basepath (pretend the line from BR to the plate - not an actual base in this order - doesn't exist, I guess) - not interference and all runners return.
The reason I don't agree with the rule, even though I understand it, is that it is also not consistent with other rules. You wouldn't call R1 on 3rd out for retreating to 3rd to avoid a tag, even if R1 was forced. Why is BR different? |
thats the problem with doing baseball and softball....differences and keeping them sorted out. I think I am leaning towards liking the softball rule that the runner is called out. Now let me think on why. :)
|
Quote:
I like the baseball rule for baseball games. There is a base running strategy to not running into a tag and making them either chase you or take the force at 1B. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
JJ |
I do a lot of softball, and I never liked that "BR can't retreat" rule. (In ASA, runners return TOI, by the way.) But there's also a rule that a BR who takes off her helmet is out, but forced runners remain forced.
Aside from the obvious things, softball treats many, many plays differently. Obstruction, nullifying runs, what can and can't be appealed, awarding of bases, runners hit by batted ball, what constitutes a force on appeal, no last time by, BOO; it goes on and on. There are also some softball plays—right in the casebook—in which the offense benefits because of deliberate interference by a BR or runner. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35am. |