The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Francisco Rodriguez bounce or stop? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/58191-francisco-rodriguez-bounce-stop.html)

jwwashburn Sun May 23, 2010 10:14pm

Francisco Rodriguez bounce or stop?
 
Watching Mets vs Yankees (Diclaimer: I have no loyalties here, I hope they both lose)

K-rod sometimes does not stop, he merely bounces off the belt.

1) Why are they letting him get away with this?

2) Would he get away with it if he were a rookie?

3) Would Bob Devidson have a coronary if he were in this game?

Joe

stratref Mon May 24, 2010 12:44pm

As far as I watch MLB and its umpiring here is how I understand this.

1) As long as it is what he normally does and is not a change used to deceive someone they normally allow pitcher to get away with it. K-Rod is not the only one to get this "courtesy" I know one of the Mariner relievers does the same thing and doesn't get called, it even gets mentioned once in a while.

2) Early in the season probably not, but after about Mid-May most likely he would as it would be understood by that time it is his normal motion.

3) Unlikely, the balks I see Davidson don't involve not stopping, he calls everything else possible, but unless blatantly horrible I haven't seen him call a borderline "no stop".

Jasper

UmpJM Mon May 24, 2010 01:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by stratref (Post 678315)
As far as I watch MLB and its umpiring here is how I understand this.

1) As long as it is what he normally does and is not a change used to deceive someone they normally allow pitcher to get away with it....

2) Early in the season probably not, but after about Mid-May most likely he would as it would be understood by that time it is his normal motion.

...

Jasper

Jasper,

Your understanding is incorrect.

Whether or not it is the pitcher's "normal motion" has nothing to do with whether or not a balk is properly called.

JM

JJ Mon May 24, 2010 01:15pm

MLB pitchers just don't get called for not stopping. I don't know why not. They just don't.

JJ

bob jenkins Mon May 24, 2010 01:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 678320)
Jasper,

Your understanding is incorrect.

Whether or not it is the pitcher's "normal motion" has nothing to do with whether or not a balk is properly called.

JM

I agree that "normal motion" isn't the written rule. There is some degree of "understanding" at the MLB level on what will / won't be called.

I have long maintained that trying to apply MLB balk standards to the level of ball most of us call (including up to fairly high-level college) is futile.

mbyron Mon May 24, 2010 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ (Post 678323)
MLB pitchers just don't get called for not stopping. I don't know why not. They just don't.

JJ

+1

Last I heard, PBUC instruction was to enforce "discernible stop," meaning more than changing directions. MLB seems to allow changing directions to count.

One more reason not to take our cues from MLB. :)

stratref Mon May 24, 2010 01:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 678320)
Jasper,

Your understanding is incorrect.

Whether or not it is the pitcher's "normal motion" has nothing to do with whether or not a balk is properly called.

JM

What about my understanding is incorrect?

No body ever mentioned "properly called" the discussion is what was likely to be called and in MLB for what ever reason correctly or incorrectly "no stop" balk are rarely if ever called, epically if that is part of a pitchers "normal motion".

Now for properly called you would be correct, but again that is not the question at hand.

Jasper

mbyron Mon May 24, 2010 08:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by stratref (Post 678331)
No body ever mentioned "properly called" the discussion is what was likely to be called and in MLB for what ever reason correctly or incorrectly "no stop" balk are rarely if ever called, epically if that is part of a pitchers "normal motion".

MLB umpires never consider whether a move is part of a pitcher's "normal motion," a term that does not appear in Rule 8. So that has no impact whatever on how likely a move is to be ruled a balk.

jwwashburn Mon May 24, 2010 10:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 678390)
MLB umpires never consider whether a move is part of a pitcher's "normal motion," a term that does not appear in Rule 8. So that has no impact whatever on how likely a move is to be ruled a balk.

Is this tongue in cheek?

I think that "normal motion" clearly plays an enormous part in the way they call balks. No one said that "normal motion" is in the book.

What I was interested in with K-Rod is that he does it sometimes and not always. This is far worse than letting him get away with it if he did it every time. It gives him a huge advantage.

Joe

mbyron Tue May 25, 2010 06:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 678394)
Is this tongue in cheek?

I think that "normal motion" clearly plays an enormous part in the way they call balks. No one said that "normal motion" is in the book.

What I was interested in with K-Rod is that he does it sometimes and not always. This is far worse than letting him get away with it if he did it every time. It gives him a huge advantage.

Joe

Not tongue in cheek, but based on pro instruction. I can't tell you what's in their heads, but I can tell you how they were taught to apply the balk rule.

If I had to speculate about why the "bounce" isn't balked, I would guess that the MLB umpire supervisors have told the staff to call it that way. Remember, those supervisors are some of the oldest umpires alive, and that's how it was called back in the day.

It's not called that way in MiLB.

As for K-Rod, his delivery is so quick, Ricky Henderson would think twice about stealing on him, even on that loopy deuce. I don't see any advantage gained.

ozzy6900 Tue May 25, 2010 10:35am

Normal Motion and Natural Delivery are simply BS!

If the pitcher's "normal motion" or "natural delivery" is a balk move, then it's a balk!

I love when I hear "But Blue, that's his natural delivery!"

SAump Tue May 25, 2010 06:50pm

Normal
 
It is not the first time. Pitchers became so use to taking a jab step toward 1b during the wind up that the rules were relaxed to permit it and then changed to allow it.

Many MLB pitchers pause two or three times before settling into the set position. It looks like their glove is "climbing down" a ladder. The pitching coaches certainly allow it. The teams allow it and the umpires now allow it. It won't be long until the rulebook will allow it.

Pitchers are walking a fine line within the rule. KRod has done it for several years now. But I do believe a balk was called against him last year. A balk, one. Can someone check? KRod motion isn't new. He did it last year. He's not alone, as other closers do it too. There are tmes when the final pause is more pronounced than the previous ones. He also tends to come set over his right hip.

DG Tue May 25, 2010 09:14pm

Watch MR in New York sometime.

bluehair Sun May 30, 2010 10:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzy6900 (Post 678430)
I love when I hear "But Blue, that's his natural delivery!"

Reply...Then he needs to change his nature.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Sun May 30, 2010 04:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ (Post 678323)
MLB pitchers just don't get called for not stopping. I don't know why not. They just don't.

JJ


And as the best pitchers in the world you would expect them to be held to the rules more stringently that H.S. players.

MTD, Sr.

bossman72 Sun May 30, 2010 09:43pm

Balks get enforced in MLB like travelling gets enforced in NBA.

johnnyg08 Sun May 30, 2010 10:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72 (Post 679313)
Balks get enforced in MLB like travelling gets enforced in NBA.

I don't think that's necessarily true.

mbyron Mon May 31, 2010 06:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72 (Post 679313)
Balks get enforced in MLB like travelling gets enforced in NBA.

Huh? Not even close. Rondo just got away with one the other night that would be the equivalent of not balking a feint to first. Sorry, this comparison is not anywhere near to apt.

David B Mon May 31, 2010 09:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 679332)
Huh? Not even close. Rondo just got away with one the other night that would be the equivalent of not balking a feint to first. Sorry, this comparison is not anywhere near to apt.

But it does make one wonder what is actually considered a balk in MLB. I mean you watch them everyday on ESPN and its hard just about everytime to actually see what was the balk.

Sure there are some that are obvious, but not many.

My son and I debated the balk Joe West called the other night and even though I tried to explain it, my son said "he stepped to first". Of course we don't have the angle that the Umpire had which is the best angle, but still ...

Thanks
David

mbyron Mon May 31, 2010 10:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by David B (Post 679342)
But it does make one wonder what is actually considered a balk in MLB. I mean you watch them everyday on ESPN and its hard just about everytime to actually see what was the balk.

Sure there are some that are obvious, but not many.

My son and I debated the balk Joe West called the other night and even though I tried to explain it, my son said "he stepped to first". Of course we don't have the angle that the Umpire had which is the best angle, but still ...

Thanks
David

I disagree with both your general claim and your specific claim.

Virtually every balk I see in MLB is obvious to me. Usually it's a flinch after coming set, or more properly, starting and stopping. Sometimes it's hard to see given one camera angle, but another one will show the balk.

I believe that both balk calls against Buehrle the other day were called because he made a move to home and then stepped and threw to 1B. One was quite obvious: though his foot moved to 1B, his entire upper body was moving toward the plate. That's a balk.

IMO, the only reason people have trouble understanding balks is that they don't bother to learn the rules. I'm including the announcers. It just ain't that difficult.

David B Mon May 31, 2010 11:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 679343)
I disagree with both your general claim and your specific claim.

Virtually every balk I see in MLB is obvious to me. Usually it's a flinch after coming set, or more properly, starting and stopping. Sometimes it's hard to see given one camera angle, but another one will show the balk.

I believe that both balk calls against Buehrle the other day were called because he made a move to home and then stepped and threw to 1B. One was quite obvious: though his foot moved to 1B, his entire upper body was moving toward the plate. That's a balk.

IMO, the only reason people have trouble understanding balks is that they don't bother to learn the rules. I'm including the announcers. It just ain't that difficult.

Well if its that obvious then I wonder why we have some very good umpires who have debated this for days on this site.

And the pitcher in question has been making this same move all season long and suddenly now its a balk?

Hmm. I agree that its not that hard, but in MLB its not always cut and dry.

At least that is my observation. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion of course.

Thanks
David

Steven Tyler Mon May 31, 2010 03:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 678554)
Watch MR in New York sometime.

If you actually think what Mariano Rivera does is a balk, then you are to umpiring what Barney Fife is to law enforcement....:(

DG Mon May 31, 2010 06:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72 (Post 679313)
Balks get enforced in MLB like travelling gets enforced in NBA.

See "Ozzie's at it again" thread.

SanDiegoSteve Tue Jun 01, 2010 01:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by David B (Post 679348)
And the pitcher in question has been making this same move all season long and suddenly now its a balk?

The fact that he has been making the same balk move all season long is completely irrelevant. I get that excuse from managers and players all the time and I don't buy it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler (Post 679371)
If you actually think what Mariano Rivera does is a balk, then you are to umpiring what Barney Fife is to law enforcement....:(

Now THAT is funny!:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1