| dash_riprock |
Thu Mar 18, 2010 08:44am |
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
(Post 668664)
I've heard some try an explanattion similar to Dash's to try to reconcile the two cases. I don't buy it.
I agree with you in how it should be called, and think that the case which says otherwise is wrong (either a wrong ruling or it's missing some information).
|
Another way to look at it:
It is clear that a bat lying stationary on the ground is considered part of the playing field - i.e., it is irrelevant to fair/foul status (unless the bat is somehow beyond 1st or 3rd base). It is also clear that a bat in the hands of the batter is not part of the playing field.
So the question is: When the bat is dropped (leaves the batter's hands), when does it become part of the playing field? If the answer is "when it stops moving," then the explanation I presented in post #7 is correct.
Unless I missed something. |
