The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   NFHS Rules, Designated Hitter Rule (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/53948-nfhs-rules-designated-hitter-rule.html)

DG Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB (Post 614440)
I don't get it. You say that where you live no one would expect the rules to be bent. Then you tell a story about a time when the team asked you to bend the rules....:confused:

You certainly don't get it... :rolleyes:

SanDiegoSteve Tue Jul 14, 2009 01:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB (Post 614440)
I don't get it. You say that where you live no one would expect the rules to be bent. Then you tell a story about a time when the team asked you to bend the rules....:confused:

They didn't expect the rules to be bent, but were pleasantly surprised when DG magnanamously agreed to do it by mutual agreement of both teams. What is so difficult to understand here?

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Jul 14, 2009 06:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ump153 (Post 614434)
Why would you assume such a thing?

No. The two are locked together. Neither one can bat in another spot in the lineup.


Ump153:

I should have ended my sentence with a question (?) mark and not a period (.).

MTD, Sr.

Ump Rube Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:23am

For ease of explaining to others...
 
I know that I am a little late to the party on this one (long DH tonight, plus a car on the jogging path near the field made for an interesting night), but here is an idea that I had regarding the DH situation, and I am wondering if this is a valid way of explaining it...
The DH and the player he is batting for are 2 halves of the same "player." They may choose to "overtake" the responsibilities of the other half, but cannot exist separately (as a whole) in the batting order.
Does that seem to cover the situation?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1